On 1/6/2012 8:35 PM, Eric Lemings wrote:
> Current 'postconf -n' output:
>
> command_directory = /usr/sbin
This is likely your default. Check with 'postconf -d command_directory'
and remove this line if it is. Don't re-specify default values in
main.cf. It simply clutters things up making sle
On Jan 6, 2012, at 5:15 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/6/2012 3:05 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
>> [root@myhost postfix]$ dig 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. any
> ...
>> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. 900 IN A 127.0.0.2
>> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org.
On 1/6/2012 3:05 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
> [root@myhost postfix]$ dig 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. any
...
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. 900 IN A 127.0.0.2
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. 900 IN A 127.0.0.10
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spam
On Jan 5, 2012, at 2:33 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/4/2012 10:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
>> You could consolidate all of your restrictions into
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions. Unless you need complex whitelisting,
>> it's usually easier that way, to only maintain one set of
>> restriction
On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
> ...
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>
> BTW "client" != "recipient", in case that is what you meant by
> duplicated settings. They are different settings, but functionally
> similar. Yo
On 5 January 2012 11:24, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were
set
[ subject changed to be relevant to the thread ]
On Thursday 05 January 2012 10:24:11 Eric Lemings wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Eric Lemings
> wrote:
> > This change seems to have been my missing link. Since I made
> > it, spam arriving in IMAP boxes has dropped drastically in the
> > p
On 1/5/2012 10:24 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
> Well I spoke too soon. The flood of spam started again this morning.
>
> Obviously something isn't working. All testimonials I've read say that grey
> listing stops 90% of spam but its not working.
>
> Eric.
How effective any particular anti-spam
On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
>>> I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were
>>> set twice, the latter of which was overriding the former.
On 1/5/2012 12:46 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
> The RBL sites come from various Postfix tutorials on the web, many of which
> are getting woefully dated. Thanks for the updates.
First, please use the generic term "dnsbl" instead of "RBL". RBL is a
copyrighted/trademarked term specific to MAPS Corp
On 1/4/2012 10:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> You could consolidate all of your restrictions into
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions. Unless you need complex whitelisting,
> it's usually easier that way, to only maintain one set of
> restrictions.
I recommend this as well. For me it's much easier to w
On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
>> I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were
>> set twice, the latter of which was overriding the former. Here's
>> the new values:
>
> The list policy asks for "pos
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
> I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were
> set twice, the latter of which was overriding the former. Here's
> the new values:
The list policy asks for "postconf -n" because that reports values
Postfix is actual
On Jan 4, 2012, at 8:21 PM, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
> Here's my Postfix configuration:
>
> [root@myhost myuser]$ postconf -n
> snip
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> On 1/4/2012 11:31 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Can anyone point me to some good guides/t
I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were set twice,
the latter of which was overriding the former. Here's the new values:
smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworkspermit_sasl_authenticated
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.orgreject_rbl_client rbl-plus.mai
Here's my Postfix configuration:
[root@myhost myuser]$ postconf -n
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
enable_server_options = yes
header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfi
On 1/4/2012 11:31 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Can anyone point me to some good guides/tutorials for configuring Postfix on
> Mac systems? In particular, I'm trying to stop spam in its tracks. I've
> tried using the Server app and the older Server Admin app. I've even tried
> man
17 matches
Mail list logo
