Re: On configuring a "dumb" postfix client ...

2012-10-11 Thread Wietse Venema
Oscar Hodgson: > On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:24:44 -0400, Viktor Dukhovni > wrote: > > > > While a null-client configuration may not be an appropriate default > > for an out of the box machine, it is definitely easily supported: > > > > http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html#quick > >

Re: On configuring a "dumb" postfix client ...

2012-10-11 Thread Oscar Hodgson
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:24:44 -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: While a null-client configuration may not be an appropriate default for an out of the box machine, it is definitely easily supported: http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html#quick Very helpful, more so than http

Re: On configuring a "dumb" postfix client ...

2012-10-11 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:19:12AM -0400, Oscar Hodgson wrote: > More Linuxen are showing up with postfix already present; it might > be preferable to "simply" configure postfix to have the same > behavior and avoid the sendmail installation altogether. However, > simply setting /etc/postfix/main