> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Peter Blair
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 10:21 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: Including state information in Received fields
>
> I&#x
sers
>> Subject: Re: Including state information in Received fields
>>
>> > But design issues aside, would you consider implementing it at some
>> > point? Indications of interest like that would be useful input to the
>> > IETF.
>>
> In my sysadmin
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:46 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: Including state information in Received fields
>
> &
Wietse:
> Postfix writes the Received: header at message arrival time. The
> decision to add a Received: state field must be made before the
> "250 OK" in response to end-of-data, after the message is frozen (*).
> Once Postfix sends "250 OK" in response to end-of-data, there is no way
> that a Re
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 2:04 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: Including state information in Received fields
>
> Pos
Murray S. Kucherawy:
> Hi,
>
> I'm co-authoring a draft that would add supplementary information
> to Received header fields indicating when a message enters some
> kind of administrative hold. This would be useful to people looking
> through trace data to figure out why a message sat on a machin
