On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:37:01AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> > Blocking old dates is unlikely to be a very effective anti-spam measure.
> > I would advise that you turn this filter off.
>
> I've turned it off for now. Certainly blocking FUTURE dates has been
> effective in the past.
Yes, blocking
On 23-Apr-2010, at 09:47, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:38:36AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
>
>> When ThunderBird forwards a message, it sends it with the ORIGINAL Date
>> header:
>>
>> This hits one of my header_checks for spammy mails:
>>
>> /^Date:.* 200[0-8]/
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:38:36AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> When ThunderBird forwards a message, it sends it with the ORIGINAL Date
> header:
>
> This hits one of my header_checks for spammy mails:
>
> /^Date:.* 200[0-8]/REJECT Your email has a date
> from the past.
