On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 07:15:19PM +0100, K.J. Petrie wrote:
> I have a server which is on 24 hours/day and a desktop which is on when
> I'm using it. Both have postfix used for delivering mail.
For ETRN to be useful, the frequently unreachable domain has to be
listed in $fast_flush_domains.
Hi LuKreme,
> On Mar 4, 2018, at 8:44 AM, LuKreme wrote:
>
> Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it?
> --
> My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways
> to reject even more mail. I'm up to about 97% now.
>
It’s a good thing in that it i
LuKreme:
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 18:29, J Doe wrote:
> > postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords
> >smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
>
> Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it?
Good if used by the right client (who needs this nowadays?), otherwise
ERTN it is a waste of scheduler res
On Feb 27, 2018, at 18:29, J Doe wrote:
> postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords
>smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it?
--
My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways to
reject even more mail. I'm up to about 97%
Hi Noel,
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 10:18 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>> ** Is Postfix logging that ETRN is disabled on the first, unencrypted SMTP
>> session and then logging this again for the encrypted session (ie: Postfix
>> is just logging I disabled this and Google is not attempting to issue ETRN
>
On 2/27/2018 8:29 PM, J Doe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I read the “Postfix ETRN Howto” [1] as well as man 5 postconf with regards to:
>
> postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords
> smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
>
> ... and disabled the announcement of ETRN via:
>
> postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords =
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:29:00PM +0200, Teun Vink wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to find a nice solution for the following problem:
> >
> > we offer backup MX facilities for many customer domains. For this, we
> > have a number of mailservers (currently 5). An F5 loadba
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:29:00PM +0200, Teun Vink wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to find a nice solution for the following problem:
>
> we offer backup MX facilities for many customer domains. For this, we
> have a number of mailservers (currently 5). An F5 loadbalancer
> distributes SMTP connect
bharathan kailath:
> we've got a gateway postfix server with which we provide mails to hosted
> domains; postfix is configured with Separate Domains with System Accounts
> (virtual alias domains and virtual alias maps); clients mail server pop up
> and collect all the their mails; it works great; b
