Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/23/2015 10:33 AM, Charles Orth wrote:
Hi All,
At this time, we're relying on extended error code 5.2.1 to drop the
connection.
I suppose you're referring to the 521 reply code.
We'd like to a more robust set of extended error codes (RFC5248)
which also dr
Charles Orth:
> Hi All,
>
> At this time, we're relying on extended error code 5.2.1 to drop the
> connection.
> We'd like to a more robust set of extended error codes (RFC5248) which
> also drop the connection.
> Has there been any discussion on Postfix providing a new feature where
> we can c
On 2/23/2015 10:33 AM, Charles Orth wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> At this time, we're relying on extended error code 5.2.1 to drop the
> connection.
I suppose you're referring to the 521 reply code.
> We'd like to a more robust set of extended error codes (RFC5248)
> which also drop the connection.
Why?
