On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 10:40:12PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 10:35:41PM -0400, post...@ptld.com wrote:
>
> > >> $ postconf smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
> > >> smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords = pipelining, chunking,
> > >> silent-discard, DSN, ETRN
> > >
> > >
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 10:35:41PM -0400, post...@ptld.com wrote:
> >> $ postconf smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
> >> smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords = pipelining, chunking,
> >> silent-discard, DSN, ETRN
> >
> > Why did you decide to turn off PIPELINING and CHUNKING?
>
> Based on the last par
$ postconf smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords = pipelining, chunking,
silent-discard, DSN, ETRN
Why did you decide to turn off PIPELINING and CHUNKING?
Based on the last paragraph of BDAT_README.html I do not see any benefit
of offering it and I assume disabling
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 08:53:27PM -0400, post...@ptld.com wrote:
> $ postconf smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
> smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords = pipelining, chunking, silent-discard, DSN,
> ETRN
Why did you decide to turn off PIPELINING and CHUNKING?
--
Viktor.
I would like for my postfix to send a DSN back to me (locally), for an
email I'm sending
out to the internet via submission port 587 as an authenticated user.
Never mind, I figured it out.
main.cf:
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords = pipelining, chunking, silent-discard,
ETRN, DSN
master.cf:
I generally disable the 'DSN' EHLO keyword on the inbound SMTP port.
$ postconf -P smtp/inet/smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
smtp/inet/smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords = silent-discard,DSN,ETRN
$ postconf -P smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
postconf: warning: unmatched request: "smtpd_discard_e
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 06:55:15PM -0400, post...@ptld.com wrote:
> Is there a setting for disabling delivery status notification reports
> being emailed back to the sender address by MAILER-DAEMON? I could not
> find one searching in postconf.5.html
I generally disable the 'DSN' EHLO keyword o
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4g0fnm4hyszj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso:
|> Ciao from Germany to the big Apple!
|> (Or maybe .. peanuts?? Or Sunflower seeds? :)
|
|All of the above? I haven't been in the city for more than a year,
Oh .. yes. And potatoes! Potatoes are good.
|bu
Steffen Nurpmeso:
> Ciao from Germany to the big Apple!
> (Or maybe .. peanuts?? Or Sunflower seeds? :)
All of the above? I haven't been in the city for more than a year,
but things are very slowly returning to normal in the Northeast US
with vaccination levels around 70 percent.
Wietse
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4g0bbj3dlnzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso:
|>|Then Postfix sends a delivery status notification.
|...
|>|Again, Postfix opens the mailbox file, does an lseek() to the end
|>|of the file, writes the message, flushes the output with fsync(),
|>|and closes
Steffen Nurpmeso:
> |Then Postfix sends a delivery status notification.
...
> |Again, Postfix opens the mailbox file, does an lseek() to the end
> |of the file, writes the message, flushes the output with fsync(),
> |and closes the mailbox file before claiming successful delivery.
> |
> |As f
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20210609165007.rc_ih%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
...
||> Jun 9 01:38:06 postfix/smtpd[17007]: B713116056: client=unknown[45.13\
||> 7\
||> .22.84]
| ...
||> status=sent (delivered to mailbox)
||
||Postfix delivers an email message with message-id
||<2021060816
Hello.
That was fast, thanks.
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4g0wjn1gdwzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso:
|> Jun 9 01:38:06 postfix/smtpd[17007]: B713116056: client=unknown[45.137\
|> .22.84]
...
|> status=sent (delivered to mailbox)
|
|Postfix delivers an email message with m
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 11:48:45AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Jun 9 01:38:07 postfix/local[17012]: B713116056:
> > to=, relay=local, delay=2.1, delays=1.3/0.01/0/0.83,
> > dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to mailbox)
>
> Postfix opens the mailbox file, does an lseek() to the end of the
Steffen Nurpmeso:
> Jun 9 01:38:06 postfix/smtpd[17007]: B713116056:
> client=unknown[45.137.22.84]
> Jun 9 01:38:06 postfix/cleanup[17011]: B713116056:
> message-id=<20210608163805.e242f6fe5d7ac...@sdaoden.eu>
> Jun 9 01:38:06 postfix/qmgr[2581]: B713116056: from=,
> size=2828, nrcpt=1
On 02/16/2016 03:39 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Epiontis IT:
Hi,
does postfix offer a way to explicitly route undeliverable notifications
for alias addresses to the postmaster instead of the mail sender.
With /etc/aliases, use the owner- prefix to redirect bounces for a
specific recipient address
Epiontis IT:
> Hi,
>
> does postfix offer a way to explicitly route undeliverable notifications
> for alias addresses to the postmaster instead of the mail sender.
With /etc/aliases, use the owner- prefix to redirect bounces for a
specific recipient address.
Quote from Posfix aliases(5):
@Ansgar Wiechars,
I am struggling to reply to you as you replied off-list and my last
attempt on the list failed. I think you've fixed the first issue but
there may be another one, perhaps with my settings or the settings you
expect from me as I now get the following bounce:
"This is the mai
Hi Ansgar,
Sorry but the same issue still exists.
If it helps I am relaying via my ISP's mailserver, smtp.ntlworld.com:465
(62.254.26.221) as I am in a dynamic IP block of addresses.
I am having to reply via the postfix list as the direct e-mail does not
work.
Regards,
Nick
On 17/04/2015
@Ansgar Wiechars
I tried to reply to your e-mail earlier today about HTML formatted
e-mails out of courtesy but received the bounce below. I don't think I
am mis-configured but if I am I'd love some help. I had a look at the
rhsbl.ahbl.org list and it seems that this list is no longer active a
Pol Hallen:
> > Do you have a AV scanner or some other after queue content filter? If
> > yes postfix is maybe telling you that the message has been transfered
> > to this next hop. IMHO you should ditch DSN because no one is
> > using/allowing it anyway, so trying to get it right is a fruitless
>
> Do you have a AV scanner or some other after queue content filter? If
> yes postfix is maybe telling you that the message has been transfered
> to this next hop. IMHO you should ditch DSN because no one is
> using/allowing it anyway, so trying to get it right is a fruitless
> effort.
Hello and t
Zitat von Pol Hallen :
Follow official postfix page (http://www.postfix.org/DSN_README.html) I've:
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps = cidr:/etc/postfix/esmtp_access
cat /etc/postfix/esmtp_access
# Allow DSN requests from local subnet only
192.168.1.0/24 silent-discard
Pol Hallen:
> Follow official postfix page (http://www.postfix.org/DSN_README.html) I've:
>
> smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps = cidr:/etc/postfix/esmtp_access
>
> cat /etc/postfix/esmtp_access
> # Allow DSN requests from local subnet only
> 192.168.1.0/24 silent-discard
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
