You can specify an alternate MTA (with smtp_fallback_relay) for
> delayed mail. There is no feature to specify an alternate delivery
> agent for delayed mail.
>
>
Hmm, I was aware of that thing. I've not used this feature but it's
definitely worth trying.
The example looks like an attempt to ci
Abhijeet Rastogi:
> Hi Wietse,
>
> This helps. Half reading is always bad. This clears everything about my
> doubt.
>
> One other thing still remains. I've multiple smtp services defined like
> this. (in master.cf, to use different IPs, selected randomly)
>
> ob-smtp1 unix- - n
Hi Wietse,
This helps. Half reading is always bad. This clears everything about my
doubt.
One other thing still remains. I've multiple smtp services defined like
this. (in master.cf, to use different IPs, selected randomly)
ob-smtp1 unix- - n - - smtp
-o smtp_
Am 25.07.2013 09:52, schrieb Abhijeet Rastogi:
> The issue is, why does postfix retry the second time instantly (within 1
> sec)? Shouldn't postfix wait till the next deferred queue scan happens?
Because that's best Postfix can do. Because Postfix SHOULD do that:
*) Because if on MX is down, th
Abhijeet Rastogi:
> Hi Wietse,
>
> Thanks for you reply. I may be wrong but I just know what I read in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.4
>
> > The sender MUST delay retrying a particular destination after one
> > attempt has failed. In general, the retry interval SHOULD be at
Hi Wietse,
Thanks for you reply. I may be wrong but I just know what I read in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.4
> The sender MUST delay retrying a particular destination after one
> attempt has failed. In general, the retry interval SHOULD be at
> least 30 minutes; however, m
Abhijeet Rastogi:
> The issue is, why does postfix retry the second time instantly (within 1
> sec)? Shouldn't postfix wait till the next deferred queue scan happens?
No, this is not required. If you disagree, please point out in
the SMTP standard, RTFM RFC 5321, where Postfix is in error.
Hi Micheal,
Thanks for your reply. Actually, the issue was I was just writing the mail
and it got Sent by mistake. (But, then reading the mail I thought that the
message was conveyed.)
The issue is, why does postfix retry the second time instantly (within 1
sec)? Shouldn't postfix wait till the n
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:16:15PM +0530, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> 1. If a mail is temporarily deferred from a remote MTA, postfix should
> back-off instantly for some time but I observed this today.
>
> Jul 24 06:40:16 server.name postfix-smtp4/smtp[6204]: DEC8B4F0185: host
> mta6.a
