Well.. I should have checked but assumed the action statements are similar
whether its transport or access.. obviously that does not seem to be the
case.
*Mail is either accepted or rejected (the sender is **told which) *- this
is my I wished or made up silent with reject. I don't want sender to
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 03:33:42PM -0500, Linux Addict wrote:
> I have no reason to use DISCARD. I also dont want sender to receive
> anything back. Is reject silently is an option?
>
> /^From:.?(no|No)(reply|-reply)@.*/ REJECT:silently
First of all, as you've already been told, header checks ar
I have no reason to use DISCARD. I also dont want sender to receive
anything back. Is reject silently is an option?
/^From:.?(no|No)(reply|-reply)@.*/ REJECT:silently
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:12 PM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 03:06:37PM -0500, Linux Addict wrote:
>
> > Sor
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 03:06:37PM -0500, Linux Addict wrote:
> Sorry.. yeah discard.
>
> But is it possible to discard noreply email for just
> only one sender? I am clear on how to discard when everything sent to
> noreply@.*.
Nothing built into Postfix will discard just the one recipient
in a
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 02:56:32PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Linux Addict:
>
> > The smtp recipient/header checks seems to parse line by line so I can
> > discord to noreply, but how do add a condition. I looked if.. endif, but I
> > am unsure how to get this done with from and to lines in on
Sorry.. yeah discard.
though there are headers checks already on this system, I can do recipient
check for this one. But is it possible to discard noreply email for just
only one sender? I am clear on how to discard when everything sent to
noreply@.*.
check_recipient_access inline:{{nore...@exam
Linux Addict:
> Folks, I am trying to configure discord when supp...@company.com sends to
> noreply@ / no-reply@.
Did you mean "discard"?
> The smtp recipient/header checks seems to parse line by line so I can
> discord to noreply, but how do add a condition. I looked if.. endif, but I
> am unsu
