On 2022-02-13 at 12:00:39 UTC-0500 (Sun, 13 Feb 2022 12:00:39 -0500)
is rumored to have said:
[...]
postfix/smtpd[1940626]: connect from unknown[5.34.207.103]
postfix/smtpd[1940626]: warning: unknown[5.34.207.103]: SASL LOGIN
authentication failed:
UGFzc3dvcmQ6
postfix/smtpd[1940626]: discon
post...@ptld.com:
> Just to clarify, does this error mean they requested SASL login and postfix
> told them it wasn't enabled?
> I am under the belief SASL logins are disabled on port 25.
> (smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no)
> Or does it mean postfix allowed them to provide login details and it failed
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 11:56:27AM -0500, post...@ptld.com wrote:
> Just to clarify, does this error mean they requested SASL login and
> postfix told them it wasn't enabled? I am under the belief SASL
> logins are disabled on port 25.
Are you sure the connection was to port 25? Is submission c
> On 02-13-2022 11:56 am, post...@ptld.com wrote:
> Just to clarify, does this error mean they requested SASL login and postfix
> told them it wasn't
> enabled?
> I am under the belief SASL logins are disabled on port 25.
> (smtpd_sasl_auth_enable =
> no)
> Or does it mean postfix allowed them to
