Re: Fast forwarding Milters Re: Calling a SMTP Milter before local_recipient_maps

2020-01-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Fred Morris: > I apologize for my boundless optimism. I think the "it can't be done" > mantra is really "it's always been this way". > > I understand that there is an impedance mismatch between the SMTP and > milter protocols in that a milter is allowed to inspect and even reject > an address supp

Fast forwarding Milters Re: Calling a SMTP Milter before local_recipient_maps

2020-01-28 Thread Fred Morris
I apologize for my boundless optimism. I think the "it can't be done" mantra is really "it's always been this way". I understand that there is an impedance mismatch between the SMTP and milter protocols in that a milter is allowed to inspect and even reject an address supplied via SMTP RECV, but i

Re: Calling a SMTP Milter before local_recipient_maps

2020-01-24 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 10:04:26AM -0800, Fred Morris wrote: > I want to call a milter as a "bump in the wire" before this check to > potentially alter local recipients prior to them ricocheting off of all > of that shininess. > > net -> Postfix -> Postfix >   ^  ^ >   |   

Re: Calling a SMTP Milter before local_recipient_maps

2020-01-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Fred Morris: > By default, local_recipient_maps looks something like this, and to be > (locally) delivered something must have an envelope recipient in here. > In fact, SMTP milters are not called until after this check is made: > > local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps >