On 01 Oct 2017, at 09:59, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> a little searching says it's correct:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg25973.html
Excellent! Thanks for researching that.
--
Apple broke AppleScripting signatures in Mail.app, so no random signatures.
On 01 Oct 2017, at 08:50, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
2. their sender addresses should be validated with smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender
On 01.10.17 09:22, @lbutlr wrote:
Do Address delimiters have an issue with this? I thought they did.
I thought that's exactly what address delimiters are f
On 01 Oct 2017, at 08:50, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> 2. their sender addresses should be validated with
> smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender
Do Address delimiters have an issue with this? I thought they did.
That is, u...@example.com sends and email "from" user+delimi...@example.com and
smtpd_r
On 27.09.17 13:49, J Doe wrote:
1. From what I understand, “backscatter” refers to e-mails such as
non-delivery reports being sent back to the originator of a spam message.
As the originator is often a forged address, the non-delivery reports is
essentially junk data. Would this be a correct d
J Doe:
>
> > On Sep 27, 2017, at 4:30 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> >
> > J Doe skrev den 2017-09-27 22:20:
> >
> > [snip]
> >> Is there a way to achieve this or as you noted, are whitelists to be
> >> avoided ? If whitelists are to be avoided what is the best practice
> >> for handling this sce
> On Sep 27, 2017, at 4:30 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> J Doe skrev den 2017-09-27 22:20:
>
> [snip]
>> Is there a way to achieve this or as you noted, are whitelists to be
>> avoided ? If whitelists are to be avoided what is the best practice
>> for handling this scenario ?
>
> why not add
J Doe skrev den 2017-09-27 22:20:
[snip]
Is there a way to achieve this or as you noted, are whitelists to be
avoided ? If whitelists are to be avoided what is the best practice
for handling this scenario ?
why not add example.org on google apps mx ? :=)
if useers not wanting your mailserver
> On Sep 27, 2017, at 2:08 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> J Doe skrev den 2017-09-27 19:49:
>
>> I recently configured Postfix 3.1.0 on a low-volume, Internet facing
>> server. Mail operations are normal, but I had two questions regarding
>> backscatter.
>
> ...
>
>> 1. From what I understand
J Doe skrev den 2017-09-27 19:49:
I recently configured Postfix 3.1.0 on a low-volume, Internet facing
server. Mail operations are normal, but I had two questions regarding
backscatter.
...
1. From what I understand, “backscatter” refers to e-mails such as
non-delivery reports being sent ba
