Den 28-10-2010 13:01, Ralf Hildebrandt skrev:
* Martin Kruse Jensen:
Nice cmd - I'm sure I'll have much joy of that. Here's the full output:
If you like that, please check out "pfqueue" :)
<2...@grefta.dk>: user unknown. Command output: Invalid user specified.
So, find out why mail for 2...
* Martin Kruse Jensen :
> Nice cmd - I'm sure I'll have much joy of that. Here's the full output:
If you like that, please check out "pfqueue" :)
> <2...@grefta.dk>: user unknown. Command output: Invalid user specified.
So, find out why mail for 2...@grefta.dk is being accepted...
In which map
* Martin Kruse Jensen :
> Den 28-10-2010 10:36, Ralf Hildebrandt skrev:
> >* Martin Kruse Jensen:
> >>Hi.
> >>
> >>I'm having quite some trouble trying to prevent backscatter on my
> >>postfix server. Mail queue is filled with undeliverable mailer daemon
> >>messages. Yesterday I added local_recipi
Den 28-10-2010 10:36, Ralf Hildebrandt skrev:
* Martin Kruse Jensen:
Hi.
I'm having quite some trouble trying to prevent backscatter on my
postfix server. Mail queue is filled with undeliverable mailer daemon
messages. Yesterday I added local_recipient_maps but it dosn't seem
to have helped...
* Martin Kruse Jensen :
> Hi.
>
> I'm having quite some trouble trying to prevent backscatter on my
> postfix server. Mail queue is filled with undeliverable mailer daemon
> messages. Yesterday I added local_recipient_maps but it dosn't seem
> to have helped...
WHAT exactly is bouncing? Check the
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009, jan gestre wrote:
> That's the funny thing, I'm using sbl-xbl spamhaus as well as
> spamcop.net but it wasn't blocked, I've now changed it to zen, I'm not
> sure though if it would have any effect.
The IP is not listed on SBL and was only listed on CBL (ergo XBL) at
2009-06-0
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:31 AM, kj
wrote:
> jan gestre wrote:
>>
>> Received: from 55.Red-88-7-191.staticIP.rima-tde.net
>> (55.Red-88-7-191.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.7.191.55])
>> by mail.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEC4148041
>> for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:58:53 +0800 (PHT)
>> Mess
jan gestre wrote:
Received: from 55.Red-88-7-191.staticIP.rima-tde.net
(55.Red-88-7-191.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.7.191.55])
by mail.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEC4148041
for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:58:53 +0800 (PHT)
Message-ID:
<365683314256959.dtwibjscpdre...@55.red-88-7-191.s
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009, jan gestre wrote:
> >>> I don't have anymore the logs from Postfix and I'm not sure if it
> >>> really is a backscatter problem, all I have right now is the
> >>> following:
> >>
> >> The message snippet is of no use. Can you post the full headers? That and
> >> a correspond
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:37 PM, jan gestre wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:31 PM, kj
> wrote:
>> jan gestre wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't have anymore the logs from Postfix and I'm not sure if it
>>> really is a backscatter problem, all I have right now is the
>>> following:
>>
>> The message snippe
On Wed, 27 May 2009, kj wrote:
> jan gestre wrote:
>> I don't have anymore the logs from Postfix and I'm not sure if it
>> really is a backscatter problem, all I have right now is the
>> following:
>
> The message snippet is of no use. Can you post the full headers? That
> and a corresponding
jan gestre wrote:
I don't have anymore the logs from Postfix and I'm not sure if it
really is a backscatter problem, all I have right now is the
following:
The message snippet is of no use. Can you post the full headers? That
and a corresponding log entry should clear things up.
From what
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of jan gestre
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 May 2009 5:00 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: BackScatter Problem
>
> > If it's backs
> If it's backscatter, it should be coming from <>, not a "valid company
> address". Please show your logs during delivery of the alleged backscatter.
>
I don't have anymore the logs from Postfix and I'm not sure if it
really is a backscatter problem, all I have right now is the
following:
-
On Wed, 27 May 2009, jan gestre wrote:
> I've a backscatter problem wherein users receives emails from valid
> company addresses but based on content of the message it is obviously
> spam. I'm using postfix 2.5 with virtual domains using mysql + dovecot
> and mailscanner and I've already read
> ht
Gaston Dassieu Blanchet wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have found the below in my Postfix logs. I believe I have a
> backscatter problem, which seems to have gotten me in some SPAM black
> lists out there:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/root# cat /var/log/maillog* | grep 54EF0453B
> Aug 18 18:26:19 Natsumi
Gaston Dassieu Blanchet wrote:
Dear All,
I have found the below in my Postfix logs. I believe I have a backscatter
problem, which seems to have gotten me in some SPAM black lists out there:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/root# cat /var/log/maillog* | grep 54EF0453B
Aug 18 18:26:19 Natsumi postfix/smtp
17 matches
Mail list logo
