On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 07:25:31PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> Another approach would be to create a “wrapped” MIME type that
> just wraps another message in base64. That has the advantage of
> working with multipart/signed et al. quoted-printable also has line
> continuations.
It is an
On 3/21/21 2:25 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> John Levine:
>> It appears that Wietse Venema said:
>>> Demi Marie Obenour:
How useful would BINARYMIME support be? It does mean that DKIM signing
would need to be done in the sending path, but I cannot think of any
reasons that would be a
John Levine:
> It appears that Wietse Venema said:
> >Demi Marie Obenour:
> >> How useful would BINARYMIME support be? It does mean that DKIM signing
> >> would need to be done in the sending path, but I cannot think of any
> >> reasons that would be a blocker. Having DKIM and DMARC built-in to
It appears that Wietse Venema said:
>Demi Marie Obenour:
>> How useful would BINARYMIME support be? It does mean that DKIM signing
>> would need to be done in the sending path, but I cannot think of any
>> reasons that would be a blocker. Having DKIM and DMARC built-in to
>> Postfix would be a n
Demi Marie Obenour:
> How useful would BINARYMIME support be? It does mean that DKIM signing
> would need to be done in the sending path, but I cannot think of any
> reasons that would be a blocker. Having DKIM and DMARC built-in to
> Postfix would be a nice feature, tbh. The only open-source MT