Re: BINARYMIME in Postfix

2021-03-21 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 07:25:31PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > Another approach would be to create a “wrapped” MIME type that > just wraps another message in base64. That has the advantage of > working with multipart/signed et al. quoted-printable also has line > continuations. It is an

Re: BINARYMIME in Postfix

2021-03-21 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 3/21/21 2:25 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > John Levine: >> It appears that Wietse Venema said: >>> Demi Marie Obenour: How useful would BINARYMIME support be? It does mean that DKIM signing would need to be done in the sending path, but I cannot think of any reasons that would be a

Re: BINARYMIME in Postfix

2021-03-21 Thread Wietse Venema
John Levine: > It appears that Wietse Venema said: > >Demi Marie Obenour: > >> How useful would BINARYMIME support be? It does mean that DKIM signing > >> would need to be done in the sending path, but I cannot think of any > >> reasons that would be a blocker. Having DKIM and DMARC built-in to

Re: BINARYMIME in Postfix

2021-03-21 Thread John Levine
It appears that Wietse Venema said: >Demi Marie Obenour: >> How useful would BINARYMIME support be? It does mean that DKIM signing >> would need to be done in the sending path, but I cannot think of any >> reasons that would be a blocker. Having DKIM and DMARC built-in to >> Postfix would be a n

Re: BINARYMIME in Postfix

2021-03-20 Thread Wietse Venema
Demi Marie Obenour: > How useful would BINARYMIME support be? It does mean that DKIM signing > would need to be done in the sending path, but I cannot think of any > reasons that would be a blocker. Having DKIM and DMARC built-in to > Postfix would be a nice feature, tbh. The only open-source MT