On 15/3/2016 9:26 μμ, Peter wrote:
All you're doing here is doubling up on -DUSE_SASL_AUTH and changing
hard-coded defaults to dovecot. Leave well enough alone and put your
dovecot SASL settings in main.cf where they belong.
Sorry for my ignorance,
Thank you very much for all the clarificati
On 16/03/16 03:16, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> A final query: S.J. Mudd's SRPMs included an SPF option. Is this option
> still valid/meaningful/useful in latest postfix versions?
Missed the above question before.
Postfix does not have any built-in support for SPF. A quick look at
Mudd's RPM shows th
On 16/03/16 03:16, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 15/3/2016 11:44 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>
>> So, it seems that initially the above compilation options are
>> disabled. Right?
>>
>
> To answer my own question, in fact, it's the other way round! For example:
>
>%bcond_without ldap
>
> means l
On 15/3/2016 11:44 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
So, it seems that initially the above compilation options are
disabled. Right?
To answer my own question, in fact, it's the other way round! For example:
%bcond_without ldap
means ldap is enabled by default!
And a second question: Could we b
On 14/3/2016 8:56 μμ, Peter wrote:
The -release RPM for CentOS 7 is at:
http://mirror.symnds.com/distributions/gf/el/7/gf/x86_64/gf-release-7-8.gf.el7.noarch.rpm
Thank you Peter,
I took a first look at your Postfix3 SRPM package today. It looks well
organized and updated.
Before I move on
On 15/03/16 07:56, Peter wrote:
> On 15/03/16 07:15, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>> Unfortunately, it seems that GhettoForge is currently (14 March) down
>> (it shows some errors with a backtrace),
>
> I wasn't aware of that and will get it fixed ASAP.
The ghettoforge site is fixed now, thanks for lett
On 15/03/16 07:15, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> Unfortunately, it seems that GhettoForge is currently (14 March) down
> (it shows some errors with a backtrace),
I wasn't aware of that and will get it fixed ASAP.
The repos are still up and those are the important parts:
http://mirror.symnds.com/distrib
Am 14.03.2016 um 19:15 schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
> Thank you all for the feedback.
>
> Unfortunately, it seems that GhettoForge is currently (14 March) down
> (it shows some errors with a backtrace), while repo.mailserver.guru does
> not appear to include source rpms (SRPMs). If I am missing somethi
Thank you all for the feedback.
Unfortunately, it seems that GhettoForge is currently (14 March) down
(it shows some errors with a backtrace), while repo.mailserver.guru does
not appear to include source rpms (SRPMs). If I am missing something,
please point me to the right direction.
It is i
It didn't overwrite them, but just renamed them to .rpmsave.
Yes. I also had to install the Perl script and MySQL packages but that was it.
On March 12, 2016 3:46:11 PM CST, Peter wrote:
>On 13/03/16 06:06, Brad Chandler wrote:
>> I recently added the ghettoforge repo to my Centos 7 vm. I want
On 13/03/16 06:06, Brad Chandler wrote:
> I recently added the ghettoforge repo to my Centos 7 vm. I wanted a
> newer version of postfix so that I could experiment with Dane. Centos 7
> is stuck on 2.10. The upgrade went smoothly. I first had to uninstall
> postfix, then install postfix3 from the g
On 13/03/16 03:48, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> Consider GhettoForge ( http://ghettoforge.org/ ), where current
> Postfix RPMs can be found. They're maintained by Peter Ajamian, whom
> I know from this mailing list and from IRC to be competent. He'll
> probably reply too.
:-)
The most recent are curre
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:56:32AM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote:
> >I understand that your choice works for you, that's fine. Just
> >saying that for most Postfix users I'd recommend sticking with
> >OpenSSL and upgrading each of Postfix and OpenSSL as opportunities
> >arise.
>
> I understand that.
On 03/12/2016 10:50 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:31:44AM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote:
I stick with 2.11.x and probably will as long as it is maintained, and I
build against LibreSSL which is controversial to some, and a devel branch of
LibreSSL - but it works for me...
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:31:44AM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote:
> I stick with 2.11.x and probably will as long as it is maintained, and I
> build against LibreSSL which is controversial to some, and a devel branch of
> LibreSSL - but it works for me...
Note, I don't test against LibreSSL, and comp
On 03/12/2016 05:04 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask whether someone has worked on J. Mudd's RPMs
(http://postfix.wl0.org/) to produce RHEL / CentOS 7 versions.
https://librelamp.com/Mail
I stick with 2.11.x and probably will as long as it is maintained, and I
build again
I recently added the ghettoforge repo to my Centos 7 vm. I wanted a
newer version of postfix so that I could experiment with Dane. Centos 7
is stuck on 2.10. The upgrade went smoothly. I first had to uninstall
postfix, then install postfix3 from the gf-plus repo. I replaced the new
main.cf and
Am 12.03.2016 um 14:04 schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask whether someone has worked on J. Mudd's RPMs
> (http://postfix.wl0.org/) to produce RHEL / CentOS 7 versions.
>
> The above site includes code for RHEL / CentOS versions 5 and 6 (not for
> all Postfix versions, but wh
On Mar 12, 2016, at 7:48 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 03:04:51PM +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>> I would like to ask whether someone has worked on J. Mudd's RPMs
>> (http://postfix.wl0.org/) to produce RHEL / CentOS 7 versions.
>>
>> The above site includes code for RHEL / CentO
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask whether someone has worked on J. Mudd's RPMs (
> http://postfix.wl0.org/) to produce RHEL / CentOS 7 versions.
>
> The above site includes code for RHEL / CentOS versions 5 and 6 (not for
> all Postfix version
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 03:04:51PM +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> I would like to ask whether someone has worked on J. Mudd's RPMs
> (http://postfix.wl0.org/) to produce RHEL / CentOS 7 versions.
>
> The above site includes code for RHEL / CentOS versions 5 and 6
> (not for all Postfix versions,
Hello,
I would like to ask whether someone has worked on J. Mudd's RPMs
(http://postfix.wl0.org/) to produce RHEL / CentOS 7 versions.
The above site includes code for RHEL / CentOS versions 5 and 6 (not for
all Postfix versions, but which can be adapted more or less easily for
current Postf
22 matches
Mail list logo
