Re: RFC 5321 address quoting for policy delegation protocol

2018-11-06 Thread Wietse Venema
Stephan Bosch: > Hi Wietse, > > > Op 06/11/2018 om 00:36 schreef Wietse Venema: > > Stephan Bosch: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is there a reason why Postfix omits quoting the localpart (when that > >> would normally be necessary according to RFC 5321) of sender and > >> recipient addresses passed to a pol

Re: RFC 5321 address quoting for policy delegation protocol

2018-11-06 Thread Stephan Bosch
Hi Wietse, Op 06/11/2018 om 00:36 schreef Wietse Venema: Stephan Bosch: Hi, Is there a reason why Postfix omits quoting the localpart (when that would normally be necessary according to RFC 5321) of sender and recipient addresses passed to a policy delegation service (in this case Dovecot quo

Re: RFC 5321 address quoting for policy delegation protocol

2018-11-05 Thread Wietse Venema
Stephan Bosch: > Hi, > > Is there a reason why Postfix omits quoting the localpart (when that > would normally be necessary according to RFC 5321) of sender and > recipient addresses passed to a policy delegation service (in this case > Dovecot quota-status)? What you see is the unquoted form

RFC 5321 address quoting for policy delegation protocol

2018-11-05 Thread Stephan Bosch
Hi, Is there a reason why Postfix omits quoting the localpart (when that would normally be necessary according to RFC 5321) of sender and recipient addresses passed to a policy delegation service (in this case Dovecot quota-status)? So for: RCPT TO:<"John Doe"@example.com> the following li