Rosenbaum, Larry M.:
If the client looks at the SIZE line of the EHLO response, it may
determine at that point that the message is too big and abort the
attempt. In that case the server doesn't have any envelope data to
log, and might not even know why the client gave up.
yes, that's the
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 08:58:38PM +, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> > Jul 8 17:46:08 mail postfix/smtp[14519]: 3mRP4H3mJMz373gD: reject:
> > END_OF_DATA from mail.external.org[192.0.2.25]: queue file size limit
> > exceeded; from=, to=, proto=ESMTP,
> > helo=
>
> If the client looks at the SI
>
> wietse:
>
> > Sorry, it is unwise to log the details of every SMTP error, let
> > alone log it with the full envelope information. That would make
> > Postfix unnecessarily vulnerable to logfile flooding.
>
> maybe I expressed myself wrong.
> I simply would like to see such a hypotetic log:
A. Schulze:
>
> wietse:
>
> > Sorry, it is unwise to log the details of every SMTP error, let
> > alone log it with the full envelope information. That would make
> > Postfix unnecessarily vulnerable to logfile flooding.
>
> maybe I expressed myself wrong.
> I simply would like to see such a hy
wietse:
Sorry, it is unwise to log the details of every SMTP error, let
alone log it with the full envelope information. That would make
Postfix unnecessarily vulnerable to logfile flooding.
maybe I expressed myself wrong.
I simply would like to see such a hypotetic log:
Jul 8 17:46:08 mai
A. Schulze:
>
> wietse:
>
> > It is theoretically possible to update lots of Postfix messages
> > with SMTP envelope information, but the price is that it instantly
> > obsoletes logfile analyzers. Does the price exceed the benefit?
>
> (at least for me) it's more valuable to get as many as poss
wietse:
It is theoretically possible to update lots of Postfix messages
with SMTP envelope information, but the price is that it instantly
obsoletes logfile analyzers. Does the price exceed the benefit?
(at least for me) it's more valuable to get as many as possible
details logged.
So my a
Wietse Venema:
> A. Schulze:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > usually I expect any smtp connection to be logged. That way I may find
> > any sender or recipient addresses
> > a user may know if complaining about missing messages. This is not
> > true if a message is rejected because it's to big.
> >
>
A. Schulze:
>
> Hello,
>
> usually I expect any smtp connection to be logged. That way I may find
> any sender or recipient addresses
> a user may know if complaining about missing messages. This is not
> true if a message is rejected because it's to big.
>
> SMTP-Reply is "552 5.3.4 Error:
