Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-17 Thread mouss
Le 11/11/2011 00:45, Steve Fatula a écrit : > This check says that the RFC requires a fully qualified hostname for HELO. > Most internet searches show this to be a "safe" check that shouldn't really > kill any real mail. Lately, noticed no ebay mail was coming through, looked > through the logs

Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-15 Thread Steve Fatula
From: Murray S. Kucherawy >To: Steve Fatula ; "simon.brere...@buongiorno.com" >; postfix users >Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 3:19 PM >Subject: RE: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety > > >Just heard back from them: >  >“Murray, FYI, I wa

RE: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-15 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
erawy Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 11:47 PM To: Steve Fatula; simon.brere...@buongiorno.com; postfix users Subject: RE: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety I've forwarded this to some standards and practices compliance people inside eBay/PayPal. I bet they'll be quite

RE: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-11 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-MSK From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Steve Fatula Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 9:04 PM To: simon.brere...@buongiorno.com; postfix users Subject: Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety From: Simon Brereton mailto:s

Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-10 Thread Steve Fatula
From: Simon Brereton >To: postfix users >Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 9:26 PM >Subject: Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety > > > >Write them a note with the RFC I say.  Standards are no good if you >let yours slip because it's Ebay.  or G

Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-10 Thread Simon Brereton
On 10 November 2011 18:45, Steve Fatula wrote: > This check says that the RFC requires a fully qualified hostname for HELO. > Most internet searches show this to be a "safe" check that shouldn't really > kill any real mail. Lately, noticed no ebay mail was coming through, looked > through the logs

Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-10 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thursday 10 November 2011 17:45:18 Steve Fatula wrote: > This check says that the RFC requires a fully qualified hostname > for HELO. Most internet searches show this to be a "safe" check > that shouldn't really kill any real mail. Lately, noticed no ebay > mail was coming through, looked throug

Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-10 Thread Steve Fatula
From: Jeroen Geilman >To: postfix-users@postfix.org >Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 6:13 PM >Subject: Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety > > >I have seen it too, on bulk mailer software (as ebay's probably is), but my >logs from the past 6 wee

Re: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname usefulness, safety

2011-11-10 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 2011-11-11 00:45, Steve Fatula wrote: This check says that the RFC requires a fully qualified hostname for HELO. Most internet searches show this to be a "safe" check that shouldn't really kill any real mail. Lately, noticed no ebay mail was coming through, looked through the logs and see en