Re: executive parser (was: Re: spf configuration woes)

2011-11-06 Thread Simon Brereton
>> > Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 9:41 AM >> > To: postfix-users@postfix.org >> > Cc: /dev/rob0 >> > Subject: Re: executive parser (was: Re: spf configuration woes) >> > >> > Just to add weight to my last posting - the use of a " &quo

Re: executive parser (was: Re: spf configuration woes)

2011-11-06 Thread David Southwell
stfix-users@postfix.org > > Cc: /dev/rob0 > > Subject: Re: executive parser (was: Re: spf configuration woes) > > > > Just to add weight to my last posting - the use of a " " as a critical > > symbol is really quite idiotic. What cannot be seen should neve

RE: executive parser (was: Re: spf configuration woes)

2011-11-05 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of David Southwell > Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 9:41 AM > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Cc: /dev/rob0 > Subject: Re: executive parser (was: Re: s

Re: executive parser (was: Re: spf configuration woes)

2011-11-05 Thread David Southwell
Just to add weight to my last posting - the use of a " " as a critical symbol is really quite idiotic. What cannot be seen should never be that significant!

Re: executive parser (was: Re: spf configuration woes)

2011-11-05 Thread David Southwell
On Saturday 05 November 2011 07:50:58 /dev/rob0 wrote: > I have cut all the irrelevant and whiny crap from the quotes, and I > ask that others please not continue that off-topic and useless > discussion. One part of this, q.v., deserves to be addressed. > > On Saturday 05 November 2011 09:03:18 Da