Re: assistance with a CIDR issue

2010-11-18 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi again! > > OK, yes I see my error, however it's still a valid range. > I do mean 94.149.64.0-255 and 94.149.65.0-255 It isn't valid CIDR notation. Maybe this little tool will help you: http://www.subnet-calculator.com/cidr.php - key in your numbers and you'll see that it will correct your range

Re: assistance with a CIDR issue

2010-11-17 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Jack put forth on 11/17/2010 11:29 AM: > So, I'm still confused as to why it doesn't like that. This is because you have not educated yourself as to what Classless Inter Domain Routing notation is. To fully understand this you will be required to convert these DECIMAL notations into BINARY notat

RE: assistance with a CIDR issue

2010-11-17 Thread Jack
Hi Jack! > If I am blocking 194.149.65.0/23 this is a standard format, it tells > us that the IP's are the 194.149.65.0-255 and 194.149.66.0-255. This is where you've got it wrong, it means 94.149.64.0-255 and 94.149.65.0-255. If you need 65 and 66 you will need to specify two /24 CIDR entries:

Re: assistance with a CIDR issue

2010-11-17 Thread Jim Berwick
On 11/17/2010 12:12 PM, Jack wrote: Hi Mark, thanks for your response, and I apologize if my brain is not grasping what your saying. If I am blocking 194.149.65.0/23 this is a standard format, it tells us that the IP's are the 194.149.65.0-255 and 194.149.66.0-255. Are we saying that the CIDR rul

Re: assistance with a CIDR issue

2010-11-17 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 11/17/2010 12:12 PM, Jack wrote: I am using CIDR lookups and am getting some warnings when it doesn't like certain IP blocks in my CIDR list. The error message seems reasonably clear. You shouldn't have any non-zero bits after the bit position indicated by the network size (/23 below). I.e.

Re: assistance with a CIDR issue

2010-11-17 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi Jack! > If I am blocking 194.149.65.0/23 this is a standard format, it tells us that > the IP's are the 194.149.65.0-255 and 194.149.66.0-255. This is where you've got it wrong, it means 94.149.64.0-255 and 94.149.65.0-255. If you need 65 and 66 you will need to specify two /24 CIDR entries: 194

RE: assistance with a CIDR issue

2010-11-17 Thread Jack
> I am using CIDR lookups and am getting some warnings when it doesn't > like certain IP blocks in my CIDR list. The error message seems reasonably clear. You shouldn't have any non-zero bits after the bit position indicated by the network size (/23 below). I.e. those CIDR entries are inconsiste

Re: assistance with a CIDR issue

2010-11-17 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 11/17/2010 11:54 AM, Jack wrote: Hello All, I am using CIDR lookups and am getting some warnings when it doesn't like certain IP blocks in my CIDR list. I'm wondering if it doesn't like the 4th octet of the IP's being a zero. Any help appreciated! Here is a small piece of the log file: The

Re: assistance with a CIDR issue

2010-11-17 Thread Mark Blackman
Jack wrote: Hello All, I am using CIDR lookups and am getting some warnings when it doesn't like certain IP blocks in my CIDR list. The error message seems reasonably clear. You shouldn't have any non-zero bits after the bit position indicated by the network size (/23 below). I.e. those CI