>
>Unfortunately I am not using clamav-milter, only clamsmtpd. This doesn't
>exclude clamav-milter as a potential solution though.
The huge weakness of clamsmtpd is that the developer says there is now way to
release false positives.
Len
Robert Schetterer skrev den 2013-02-07 08:39:
sanesecurity signatures are added to the clamd signature base
so using clamsmtpd should be ok, no need for milter, however
you better only choose sources in the sanesecurity download script
which
are not known to produce to much false positives
o
Am 07.02.2013 02:11, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
> Doug Sampson skrev den 2013-02-06 15:13:
>
>> Unfortunately I am not using clamav-milter, only clamsmtpd. This
>> doesn't exclude clamav-milter as a potential solution though.
sanesecurity signatures are added to the clamd signature base
so using cla
Doug Sampson skrev den 2013-02-06 15:13:
Unfortunately I am not using clamav-milter, only clamsmtpd. This
doesn't exclude clamav-milter as a potential solution though.
maybe send a sample msg to sanesecurity and see if it can be redone
sigs for this hits, well i will in comming days try to re
On 2/5/2013 10:22 PM, Doug Sampson wrote:
> After implementing the add-on Sanesecurity anti-spam signatures in
> response to a recent posting on the mailing list (thanks Noel!), I
> am now faced with a small issue. One of my daily Postscreen summary
> reports and a Postfix summary report are being
> Doug Sampson skrev den 2013-02-06 05:22:
>
> > Has anyone implemented a way of doing so? If it would help matters, I
> > would be happy to have any email addressed to root be skipped as
> > well.
>
> one way could be to make a clamav sigature whitelist that only hits on
> this mail reports, imh
Doug Sampson skrev den 2013-02-06 05:22:
Has anyone implemented a way of doing so? If it would help matters, I
would be happy to have any email addressed to root be skipped as
well.
one way could be to make a clamav sigature whitelist that only hits on
this mail reports, imho clamav whitelis
