RE: Undefined MX record for a sender domain

2012-02-29 Thread Scappatura Rocco
Thank you Mark, > On 16/02/2012 16:07, Scappatura Rocco wrote: > > >> > >> What do your logs say when your server tries to deliver the DSN? > > > > status=deferred (connect to domain.tld[xxx.yyy.uuu.vvv]:25: Connection > timed out) > > Which proves that the problem is not lack of DNS, since your

Re: Undefined MX record for a sender domain

2012-02-16 Thread Mark Goodge
On 16/02/2012 16:07, Scappatura Rocco wrote: What do your logs say when your server tries to deliver the DSN? status=deferred (connect to domain.tld[xxx.yyy.uuu.vvv]:25: Connection timed out) Which proves that the problem is not lack of DNS, since your server is finding an IP address to d

RE: Undefined MX record for a sender domain

2012-02-16 Thread Scappatura Rocco
> On 16/02/2012 15:26, Scappatura Rocco wrote: > >> Scappatura Rocco: > >>> I would like that sender domain names for which is not > >>> configured any MX record are not relayed from my MTA. I have > >>> tried to use the > >> > >> That would be a mistake. There is no RFC REQUIREMENT that a domain >

Re: Undefined MX record for a sender domain

2012-02-16 Thread Mark Goodge
On 16/02/2012 15:26, Scappatura Rocco wrote: Scappatura Rocco: I would like that sender domain names for which is not configured any MX record are not relayed from my MTA. I have tried to use the That would be a mistake. There is no RFC REQUIREMENT that a domain has an MX record. I have no

Re: Undefined MX record for a sender domain

2012-02-16 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:26:58PM +0100, Scappatura Rocco wrote: > > Scappatura Rocco: > > > I would like that sender domain names for which is not configured > > > any MX record are not relayed from my MTA. I have tried to use the > > > > That would be a mistake. There is no RFC REQUIREMENT tha

RE: Undefined MX record for a sender domain

2012-02-16 Thread Scappatura Rocco
> Scappatura Rocco: > > I would like that sender domain names for which is not configured > > any MX record are not relayed from my MTA. I have tried to use the > > That would be a mistake. There is no RFC REQUIREMENT that a > domain has an MX record. > I have no doubt about the correctness of w

Re: Undefined MX record for a sender domain

2012-02-16 Thread Mark Goodge
On 16/02/2012 14:35, Scappatura Rocco wrote: I would like that sender domain names for which is not configured any MX record are not relayed from my MTA. Why? MX records are not required for receiving mail. Nor are they required for sending mail. So there is no reason to reject mail which la

Re: Undefined MX record for a sender domain

2012-02-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Scappatura Rocco: > I would like that sender domain names for which is not configured > any MX record are not relayed from my MTA. I have tried to use the That would be a mistake. There is no RFC REQUIREMENT that a domain has an MX record. Wietse