Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread @lbutlr
On 15 Jul 2019, at 13:44, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > On 7/15/19 3:29 PM, Bill Cole wrote: >> On 15 Jul 2019, at 14:02, Phil Stracchino wrote: >>> And here's the log of the last failure: >> >> [...] >>> Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[25139]: Starting >>> Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[251

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 7/15/19 4:56 PM, Bill Cole wrote: > On 15 Jul 2019, at 15:44, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> The question that comes to mind here is, if one should not reject mail >> based on SPF failures, then what is even the point of checking SPF? > > A test of SPF can have exactly one out of a fixed set of 7 p

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Bill Cole
On 15 Jul 2019, at 15:44, Phil Stracchino wrote: On 7/15/19 3:29 PM, Bill Cole wrote: On 15 Jul 2019, at 14:02, Phil Stracchino wrote: And here's the log of the last failure: [...] Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[25139]: Starting Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[25139]: Config: {'debug

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 7/15/19 4:08 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 7/15/2019 2:44 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> >> The question that comes to mind here is, if one should not reject mail >> based on SPF failures, then what is even the point of checking SPF? > > Please distinguish between "SPF check failed because this is

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Noel Jones
On 7/15/2019 2:44 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: On 7/15/19 3:29 PM, Bill Cole wrote: On 15 Jul 2019, at 14:02, Phil Stracchino wrote: And here's the log of the last failure: [...] Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[25139]: Starting Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[25139]: Config: {'debugLevel

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Michael
According to this site, websitewelcome has 10 lookups on its own: https://emailstuff.org/spf/check The websitewelcome spf record includes the google spf record, so forevermetalroof.com shouldn't need the mx in their spf. The emailstuff.org tool has an SPF minimizer that looks interesting. Bu

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 7/15/19 3:29 PM, Bill Cole wrote: > On 15 Jul 2019, at 14:02, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> And here's the log of the last failure: > > [...] >> Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[25139]: Starting >> Jul 15 13:49:11 minbar policyd-spf[25139]: Config: {'debugLevel': 3, >> 'HELO_reject': 'SPF_Not_Pas

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 7/15/19 3:12 PM, Fazzina, Angelo wrote: > When you plug your domain [forevermetalroof.com] in here you see too many > lookups explained better Yeah, that's what I figured out and several others pointed out. Looks like the problem is the company's mail hosting, and their IT guy is working on

Re: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Bill Cole
On 15 Jul 2019, at 14:02, Phil Stracchino wrote: I have mail from one specific domain (handled by Google) being rejected by pypolicyd-spf because of an apparent DNS lookup problem — 'SPF Permanent Error: Too many DNS lookups' That should not cause rejection. It should be the equivalent of not

RE: SPF failure

2019-07-15 Thread Fazzina, Angelo
When you plug your domain [forevermetalroof.com] in here you see too many lookups explained better https://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/ limit is 10. -ANGELO FAZZINA ang...@uconn.edu University of Connecticut,  ITS, SSG, Server Systems 860-486-9075 -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us