Re: SBC Global

2008-12-04 Thread Christian Surchi
Il giorno mer, 03/12/2008 alle 20.49 -0800, Bill Light ha scritto: > Don't shoot the messenger, but 64.22.79.211 is on 11 different > (fiveten...) blacklists. And, I personally have lots of trouble with > Global Net Access which seems to host more than its share of spam > houses. My local blac

Re: SBC Global

2008-12-03 Thread Bill Light
James D. Parra wrote: SBCGlobal does not block ingress port 25 to their mailservers. They block egress 25 from their residential networks. ~ BDA is correct. That is what I meant. Sorry for the confusion. ~James Don't shoot the messenger, but 64.22.79.211 is

RE: SBC Global

2008-12-03 Thread James D. Parra
SBCGlobal does not block ingress port 25 to their mailservers. They block egress 25 from their residential networks. ~ BDA is correct. That is what I meant. Sorry for the confusion. ~James

Re: SBC Global

2008-12-03 Thread mouss
Greg Coates a écrit : > OK. My IP is 64.22.79.211 > $ host 64.22.79.211 211.79.22.64.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer coatesoft.com. $ host 64.22.79.212 212.79.22.64.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer datingfreely.com. $ host 64.22.79.213 213.79.22.64.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer freetoswing.

Re: SBC Global

2008-12-03 Thread J.P. Trosclair
Greg Coates wrote: OK. My IP is 64.22.79.211 Greg I see no obvious problems with your DNS. I also have no problem connecting to sbcmx3.prodigy.net (from your logs) on port 25 from our network. Here the host resolves to the same IP address as listed in your logs as well. It may be time to

Re: SBC Global

2008-12-03 Thread Greg Coates
OK. My IP is 64.22.79.211 Greg mouss wrote: Greg Coates a écrit : Of course. I can't believe I didn't think of that. Is there any way to get postfix to _send_ using port 587 for certain domains? 587 is for submission, not for MX. if you have an account at an ISP, you can use 587 if the I

Re: SBC Global

2008-12-03 Thread N. Yaakov Ziskind
James D. Parra wrote (on Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 03:00:51PM -0800): > Nov 30 05:54:28 mydomain postfix/smtp[28398]: connect to > sbcmx5.prodigy.net[207.115.21.24]: Connection timed out (port 25) > Nov 30 05:54:28 mydomain postfix/smtp[28398]: 3980347D80A2: > to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay

Re: SBC Global

2008-12-03 Thread mouss
Greg Coates a écrit : > Of course. I can't believe I didn't think of that. > > Is there any way to get postfix to _send_ using port 587 for certain > domains? > 587 is for submission, not for MX. if you have an account at an ISP, you can use 587 if the ISP offers it. otherwise, you send to the

Re: SBC Global

2008-12-03 Thread Bryan Allen
+-- | On 2008-12-03 15:14:28, Greg Coates wrote: | | Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:14:28 -0800 | From: Greg Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | To: postfix-users@postfix.org | Subject: Re: SBC Global | | Of course. I can

Re: SBC Global

2008-12-03 Thread Greg Coates
Of course. I can't believe I didn't think of that. Is there any way to get postfix to _send_ using port 587 for certain domains? Greg James D. Parra wrote: Nov 30 05:54:28 mydomain postfix/smtp[28398]: connect to sbcmx5.prodigy.net[207.115.21.24]: Connection timed out (port 25) Nov 30 05:54

RE: SBC Global

2008-12-03 Thread James D. Parra
Nov 30 05:54:28 mydomain postfix/smtp[28398]: connect to sbcmx5.prodigy.net[207.115.21.24]: Connection timed out (port 25) Nov 30 05:54:28 mydomain postfix/smtp[28398]: 3980347D80A2: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=283474, delays=283324/0.04/150/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect t