Rob,
>"postconf mail_version"
Version: 2.6.6
>This is surely not what you want. You're talking about mail which
>comes from Google; they are not within your $mynetworks (or, if they
>are, you have very serious problems.
We use Google services for Mail and such, so we could discontinue our
use
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:47:42AM -0600, Blake wrote:
> I have settled on the following configuration, but am still open
> to ideas.
>
> smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject
This says, *if* you are using a version 2.10 or newer (you didn't
answer that question), that you will ON
Wolfgang & Noel
Thanks for your response and you both make some good points.
The intent of using reject_unverified_recipient as I understood it was
that it would probe the associated relay server and if the message
bounced than my relay server would bounce the message for that address
for the
On 3/10/2014 3:32 PM, Blake wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have a postfix server which is running great and would like to
> clean up a few items.
>
> Due to systems outside of my control I am unable to remove invalid
> recipient addresses which are known to be bad. I wish threatening
> the owners of
In an older episode, on 2014-03-10 21:32, Blake wrote:
In short I have several systems sending emails to invalid addresses
which are bounced by Google. I would like to reject the messages at the
postfix system using an access list.
I thought this configuration would work but it is not having t
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:09:18PM -0600, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> I've been poring over this email for five days now, and just can't wrap
> my mind around what Viktor's example configuration is doing. I understand
> what he *says* it's doing, but I can't look at the configuration an
plicitly allowed in the
lines above it, regardless of the sender/recipient restrictions defined in
main.cf. Where am I going wrong here?
-Original Message-
From: Victor Duchovni [mailto:victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com]
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 12:56 PM
To: Larsen, Michael W.
Cc: postfix-us
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:52:04PM -0600, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. How does this configuration determine if all
> mail from a client should be relayed, or only the mail allowed by the
> allowed-sender/allowed-recipient rules? There are some hosts I don't
> want
ix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 12:43 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Relay restrictions
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:24:13PM -0600, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> Thanks again for trying
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:24:13PM -0600, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> Thanks again for trying to help, Viktor, but I'm unable to ascertain
> how your suggested configuration fulfills my goal. It appears to me that
> your config discards mail from all clients unless they're listed in the
er 30, 2010 2:43 PM
To: Larsen, Michael W.
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Relay restrictions
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 02:09:57PM -0600, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> Perhaps I misunderstood, but you said:
>
> > With this all mail is discarded unl
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 02:09:57PM -0600, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> Perhaps I misunderstood, but you said:
>
> > With this all mail is discarded unless *all* (my emphasis) the conditions
> > below are met:
> >
> > - From an allowed SMTP client (IP address CIDR table)
> > -
e allowed, but the
sender/recipient restrictions asserted.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 1:55 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Relay restrictions
On T
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 01:45:57PM -0600, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> Thanks for trying to help Viktor, but I don't think this configuration will
> work for me. Let me try to explain; when I made my original post, others on
> the list were somewhat surprised regarding my intent.
>
>
tfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Relay restrictions
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:17:57PM -0600, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> > # See what addresses are allowed to relay as senders.
> > # Check them against allowed recipients in recipient_acce
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:17:57PM -0600, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> > # See what addresses are allowed to relay as senders.
> > # Check them against allowed recipients in recipient_access
> > # under smtpd_restriction_classes.
> > check_sender_access ha
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 10:37 AM
To: Larsen, Michael W.
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Relay restrictions
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 09:15
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 09:15:30AM -0600, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> With Noel's explanation I think I got it figured out, but before I try it I'd
> appreciate other brains validating what I've created as a sanity check.
> Here's what I have:
>
>
> ###
> smtpd_recipient_restriction
or the help, Noel and all.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Noel Jones
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 11:28 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Relay restrictions
On 12/29/2010 10:31 AM, michael.la
Le 29/12/2010 17:31, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com a écrit :
> Back in August several people helped me with the problem linked here:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg26629.html
>
> It was almost what I needed, but I didn't completely understand what I was
> asking for
On 12/29/2010 10:31 AM, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
Back in August several people helped me with the problem
linked here:
_http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg26629.html_
It was almost what I needed, but I didn’t completely
understand what I was asking for at the tim
21 matches
Mail list logo
