Re: Mail rejected on "Received From"

2010-03-18 Thread Aaron Wolfe
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Kaleb Hosie wrote: > Maybe this is not the best practice, however I don't block any incoming mail > (destined for a legit address) for the same reason. I use a program called > SpamAssassin Quarantine and I let it scan for the spam. > content scanning every mess

RE: Mail rejected on "Received From"

2010-03-18 Thread Kaleb Hosie
Maybe this is not the best practice, however I don't block any incoming mail (destined for a legit address) for the same reason. I use a program called SpamAssassin Quarantine and I let it scan for the spam. Spam is put in quarantine and doesn't effect the users. It sends out an email every day

Re: Mail rejected on "Received From"

2010-03-18 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 06:43:29PM +, Kay wrote: > I often see mail being rejected by recipient servers because > an IP in a Received From header is blacklisted somewhere. > > This strikes me as a rather bad practise, since it undermines > the whole idea of SMTP authentication. > > Here's an

Re: Mail rejected on "Received From"

2010-03-18 Thread Noel Jones
On 3/18/2010 1:43 PM, Kay wrote: Hi guys, I often see mail being rejected by recipient servers because an IP in a Received From header is blacklisted somewhere. This strikes me as a rather bad practise, since it undermines the whole idea of SMTP authentication. Here's an example reject: 550 5