Stephen Atkins:
> So is this valid or bad?
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>permit_mynetworks,
>permit_sasl_authenticated,
>reject_unauth_destination,
This is safe. When you put the access table lookups after these,
then you can't become an open relay.
Wietse
On 12/30/2011 4:11 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stephen Atkins:
On 12/30/2011 3:59 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stephen Atkins:
So it turns out my replacement while I was on vacation modified my
main.cf. I went back to an back up I have a few weeks ago and changed
it back. Now I don't have that prob
Stephen Atkins:
> On 12/30/2011 3:59 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Stephen Atkins:
> >> So it turns out my replacement while I was on vacation modified my
> >> main.cf. I went back to an back up I have a few weeks ago and changed
> >> it back. Now I don't have that problem any more. What it came
On 12/30/2011 3:59 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stephen Atkins:
So it turns out my replacement while I was on vacation modified my
main.cf. I went back to an back up I have a few weeks ago and changed
it back. Now I don't have that problem any more. What it came down to
was "check_relay_domains"
Stephen Atkins:
> So it turns out my replacement while I was on vacation modified my
> main.cf. I went back to an back up I have a few weeks ago and changed
> it back. Now I don't have that problem any more. What it came down to
> was "check_relay_domains" had been removed for some reason.
U
On 12/30/2011 2:12 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Friday 30 December 2011 14:46:46 Lorens Kockum wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:51:27PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
These are rejected and not useful to our discussion. Please
show ALL the postfix logging of a suspect transaction that
makes it to your q
On Friday 30 December 2011 14:46:46 Lorens Kockum wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:51:27PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> > These are rejected and not useful to our discussion. Please
> > show ALL the postfix logging of a suspect transaction that
> > makes it to your queue. In particular, we want
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:51:27PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> These are rejected and not useful to our discussion. Please show
> ALL the postfix logging of a suspect transaction that makes it to
> your queue. In particular, we want to see if there is a
> sasl_username= line logged for a suspiciou
On 12/30/2011 11:31 AM, Stephen Atkins wrote:
>
> Here is the output of my postconf -n
>
> bounce_queue_lifetime = 2h
Instead of covering up the problem of a queue full of bounces, don't
accept mail you aren't able to deliver. This usually means don't
use wildcard aliases, do correctly populat
Stephen Atkins:
> sorry for the inconvenience. Looks like I just have to fix that.
> Here's the log of a couple:
>
> Dec 30 10:29:02 mta5 postfix/smtpd[3679]: E6F13186001: reject: RCPT from
> unknown[113.94.89.26]: 554 5.7.1 : Recipient
> address rejected: 521; from=
> to= proto=ESMTP helo=
>
same username, from address etc
and determine the problem that way.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Atkins
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 12:31 PM
To: postfix users
Cc: Noel Jones
Subject: Re: I'm an
On 12/30/2011 10:26 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/30/2011 11:19 AM, Stephen Atkins wrote:
On 12/30/2011 10:17 AM, Gary Smith wrote:
I've been administering the same postfix server for years so I'm
a little
confused as to how this happened. Granted postifx hasn't been
updated in a
year or so.
Th
On 12/30/2011 10:19 AM, Stephen Atkins wrote:
On 12/30/2011 10:17 AM, Gary Smith wrote:
I've been administering the same postfix server for years so I'm a
little
confused as to how this happened. Granted postifx hasn't been updated
in a
year or so.
This morning I came in to a mailq of over 9300
On 12/30/2011 11:19 AM, Stephen Atkins wrote:
> On 12/30/2011 10:17 AM, Gary Smith wrote:
>>> I've been administering the same postfix server for years so I'm
>>> a little
>>> confused as to how this happened. Granted postifx hasn't been
>>> updated in a
>>> year or so.
>>>
>>> This morning I came
Am 30.12.2011 18:19, schrieb Stephen Atkins:
> On 12/30/2011 10:17 AM, Gary Smith wrote:
>>> I've been administering the same postfix server for years so I'm a little
>>> confused as to how this happened. Granted postifx hasn't been updated in a
>>> year or so.
>>>
>>> This morning I came in to
On 12/30/2011 10:17 AM, Gary Smith wrote:
I've been administering the same postfix server for years so I'm a little
confused as to how this happened. Granted postifx hasn't been updated in a
year or so.
This morning I came in to a mailq of over 93000 messages all destine to
@yahoo.com.tw
For n
> I've been administering the same postfix server for years so I'm a little
> confused as to how this happened. Granted postifx hasn't been updated in a
> year or so.
>
> This morning I came in to a mailq of over 93000 messages all destine to
> @yahoo.com.tw
>
> For now I'm just blocking all ema
17 matches
Mail list logo
