On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 04:14:31PM -, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> > It works in practice. A few Postfix TLS proxies have been terminating TLS
> > connections, making access control decisions and forwarding unencrypted
> > SMTP to a non-Postfix server for many years now.
> >
> > These systems o
It works in practice. A few Postfix TLS proxies have been terminating TLS
connections, making access control decisions and forwarding unencrypted
SMTP to a non-Postfix server for many years now.
These systems only run "smtpd" as a proxy, and use various internal
services, but otherwise there is no
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:00:14AM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Tripathy
> wrote:
> >
> > BTW, the machines in the CDE will all have anti-virus and automatic updates
> > enabled.
> >
> > So, back to postfix, can it do such a thing? Act as a "pro
Jonathan Tripathy:
> So, back to postfix, can it do such a thing? Act as a "proxy" and
> not a "store and forward relay"
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html
Someone will still have to monitor the logfile, and deal with
"postmaster notification" email depending on how the notify_classes
On 18/03/2010 13:53, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
So, back to postfix, can it do such a thing? Act as a "proxy" and not a
"store and forward relay"
In SMTP terms, a proxy is effectively the same thing as a
store-and-forward relay. But yes, Postfix will do this very well. For
inbound mail, you ca
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
>
> BTW, the machines in the CDE will all have anti-virus and automatic updates
> enabled.
>
> So, back to postfix, can it do such a thing? Act as a "proxy" and not a
> "store and forward relay"
>
>
>
In theory you can to use 'smtpd_proxy
