Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> We recently took over a company that used SPF.
>
> Because our e-mail infra is way more complicated than theirs and we have
> tons of external parties who send mails using our domains, we decided
> long ago not to use SPF.
>
>
>
"martijn.list" wrote:
> > I’m no expert on SPF but as far as I understand it only checks if a
> > sender is ‘allowed’ to send using that domain, so no relation what so
> > ever on dropping mail from parties that don’t use SPF… Or am I missing
> > something?
>
> A lot of statistics are used to fi
I’m no expert on SPF but as far as I understand it only checks if a
sender is ‘allowed’ to send using that domain, so no relation what so
ever on dropping mail from parties that don’t use SPF…
Or am I missing something?
A lot of statistics are used to filter out spam so it wouldn't surprise
m
W dniu 2009-04-17 08:50, Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL pisze:
Hi All,
We recently took over a company that used SPF.
Because our e-mail infra is way more complicated than theirs and we
have tons of external parties who send mails using our domains, we
decided long ago not to use SPF.
Hi All,
We recently took over a company that used SPF.
Because our e-mail infra is way more complicated than theirs and we have
tons of external parties who send mails using our domains, we decided
long ago not to use SPF.
Now they say that %5 of their mailings don't arrive at customers
an
