Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-31 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: > --On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:53 PM -0400 Wietse Venema > wrote: > > > Quanah Gibson-Mount: > >> --On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:02 AM -0400 Wietse Venema > >> wrote: > >> > >> > This patch breaks "postfix start", i.e. the master terminates > >> > with an error. I

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-31 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:53 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: Quanah Gibson-Mount: --On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:02 AM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: > This patch breaks "postfix start", i.e. the master terminates > with an error. I'll investigate this as electric power permits. It

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-31 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: > --On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:02 AM -0400 Wietse Venema > wrote: > > > This patch breaks "postfix start", i.e. the master terminates > > with an error. I'll investigate this as electric power permits. It depends on main.cf configuration. Below is the corrected versio

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-31 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:02 AM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: This patch breaks "postfix start", i.e. the master terminates with an error. I'll investigate this as electric power permits. Hi Wietse, Just to note, I do not see this issue with Linux systems. The "master" process works

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-31 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: > Quanah Gibson-Mount: > > --On Monday, October 29, 2012 2:21 PM -0400 Wietse Venema > > wrote: > > > > > Quanah Gibson-Mount: > > >> When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns: > > >> > > >> zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks > > >> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.13

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: > >> The patch definitely strips off the %eth0 bit. > >> > >> [root@zre-rhel6-64 postfix]# /opt/zimbra/postfix/sbin/postconf -d > >> mynetworks mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128 > >> [fc00:10:137:242::]/64 [fe80::]/64 > > > > Good. Maybe it is worthwhile to st

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-29 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, October 29, 2012 3:49 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: Quanah Gibson-Mount: --On Monday, October 29, 2012 2:21 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: > Quanah Gibson-Mount: >> When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns: >> >> zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks >> mynetwork

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: > --On Monday, October 29, 2012 2:21 PM -0400 Wietse Venema > wrote: > > > Quanah Gibson-Mount: > >> When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns: > >> > >> zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks > >> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128 > >> [fc00:1

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-29 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, October 29, 2012 2:21 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: Quanah Gibson-Mount: When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns: zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128 [fc00:10:137:242::]/64 [fe80::%eth0]/64 Try this. Build

PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: > When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns: > > zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks > mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128 [fc00:10:137:242::]/64 > [fe80::%eth0]/64 Try this. Build Postfix without installing it, then execute ``bin/postconf -d'

Re: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-28 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Sunday, October 28, 2012 9:49 AM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: Viktor Dukhovni: 20101108 Workaround: strip off IPv6 datalink suffix from peer address to avoid problems with strict address checking code. Files: smtpd/smtpd_peer.c, qmqpd/qmqpd_peer.c. this solves

Re: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Viktor Dukhovni: > 20101108 > > Workaround: strip off IPv6 datalink suffix from peer address > to avoid problems with strict address checking code. Files: > smtpd/smtpd_peer.c, qmqpd/qmqpd_peer.c. > > this solves the issue when clients with link-local address

Re: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-26 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:49:39PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > >>When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns: > >> > >>zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks > >>mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128 > >>[fc00:10:137:242::]/64 [fe80::%eth0]/64 > > > >I thought tha

Re: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-26 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Friday, October 26, 2012 10:21 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: Quanah Gibson-Mount: When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns: zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128 [fc00:10:137:242::]/64 [fe80::%eth0]/64 I though that a

Re: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-26 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: > When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns: > > zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks > mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128 [fc00:10:137:242::]/64 > [fe80::%eth0]/64 I though that as of a few releases Postfix drops the %interface junk from an I

Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-26 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns: zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128 [fc00:10:137:242::]/64 [fe80::%eth0]/64 Which Zimbra uses for mynetworks values throughout our application where necessary (Amavis, SA, OpenDKIM,