Re: Question on master.cf (possible documentation patch)

2016-01-16 Thread Bill Shirley
I'm no Postfix guru but I'm using this on the backup mx. Suppose your domain is example.com. /etc/postfix/main.cf: transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/my.tables/transport /etc/postfix/my.tables/transport: example.comsmtp:[primary.example.com]:12345 .example.comsmtp:[prima

Re: Question on master.cf

2016-01-16 Thread Curtis Villamizar
In message Paul Goyette writes: > While researching to see if I could find a way to fix my other issue > (how my primary-MX server can differentiate between messages originating > on my backup-MX server and those that are simply relayed from elsewhere) > I thought maybe I could configure the bac

Re: Question on master.cf (possible documentation patch)

2016-01-16 Thread Paul Goyette
Well, I think I spoke too soon. I do have the dual-transport mechanism set up. But I still have a "classification" problem! On the backup-MX machine, I would like to have the equivalent of if (message_origin == local) then relay via transport1 else

Re: Question on master.cf (possible documentation patch)

2016-01-16 Thread Paul Goyette
OK, I got this working! (Persistence pays off...) On the backup MX, I made sure that $mydestination was correctly set, and then set $local_transport to "smtp:nexthop:port" On the primary server, I created a new smtpd transport (listener) [:::::x]: inet n - n -

Re: Question on master.cf (possible documentation patch)

2016-01-16 Thread Paul Goyette
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 04:00:48PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote: my_smtp:12345 inet n - n - - smtpd But it's not clear to me if this syntax will define a new listener (in which case this would belong on my primary-MX machine) or if this

Re: Question on master.cf (possible documentation patch)

2016-01-16 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 04:00:48PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote: > my_smtp:12345 inet n - n - - smtpd > > But it's not clear to me if this syntax will define a new listener (in > which case this would belong on my primary-MX machine) or if this would > enable an _outgoing_ connection to

Question on master.cf

2016-01-16 Thread Paul Goyette
While researching to see if I could find a way to fix my other issue (how my primary-MX server can differentiate between messages originating on my backup-MX server and those that are simply relayed from elsewhere) I thought maybe I could configure the backup-MX to use two different smtp transport