On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:22:46AM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
You truly need to ask whoever runs that other server to explain why they
believe your server is misconfigured if you want a definitive answer.
On 18.01.19 07:06, Mayuresh wrote:
This is certainly strangest of the mailing lists I ever p
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:22:46AM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> You truly need to ask whoever runs that other server to explain why they
> believe your server is misconfigured if you want a definitive answer.
This is certainly strangest of the mailing lists I ever participated in. I
am certainly sign
On 17 Jan 2019, at 11:03, Mayuresh wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:47:18AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
The default code of 5.7.1 is the one I want as well. Log and the
bounced
mail to gmail confirms that was the one that was used.
But an additional remark gmail makes is "the remote server i
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:47:18AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > The default code of 5.7.1 is the one I want as well. Log and the bounced
> > mail to gmail confirms that was the one that was used.
> >
> > But an additional remark gmail makes is "the remote server is
> > misconfigured".
> >
> >
Mayuresh:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 07:25:42AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > reject, with error code:
> > http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html (section: REJECT ACTIONS)
> >
>
> The default code of 5.7.1 is the one I want as well. Log and the bounced
> mail to gmail confirms that was the one
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 07:25:42AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> reject, with error code:
> http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html (section: REJECT ACTIONS)
>
The default code of 5.7.1 is the one I want as well. Log and the bounced
mail to gmail confirms that was the one that was used.
But an
Mayuresh:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:14:37AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > insiders_only = check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/insiders,
> > reject
>
> On above line if I replace reject with reject_unauth_destination it
> becomes permissive rather than rejecting.
>
> What is the ex
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:14:37AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> insiders_only = check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/insiders, reject
On above line if I replace reject with reject_unauth_destination it
becomes permissive rather than rejecting.
What is the exact difference between reject
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:14:37AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> All I suggested was to split smtpd_recipient_restrictions
> and use smtpd_relay_restrictions for the spam blocks.
>
> That was, TO SPLIT smtpd_recipient_restrictions, NOT TO REMOVE
> the hash maps.
Ok, thanks.
Mayuresh
Mayuresh:
> Sure. Basically I see only one hash in your snippet - that of the
> protected destinations. I did not notice a hash of senders allowed to send
> to the protected destinations. Am I missing something?
Original example:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 08:58:57PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Mayuresh:
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 01:31:44PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > This example can be simplified by using smtpd_relay_restrictions
> > > (Posfix 2.10 and later).
> > >
> > > smtpd_relay_restrictions =
> > > pe
Mayuresh:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 01:31:44PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > This example can be simplified by using smtpd_relay_restrictions
> > (Posfix 2.10 and later).
> >
> > smtpd_relay_restrictions =
> > permit_mynetworks
> > permit_sasl_authenticated
> > reject_unauth_des
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 01:31:44PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> This example can be simplified by using smtpd_relay_restrictions
> (Posfix 2.10 and later).
>
> smtpd_relay_restrictions =
> permit_mynetworks
> permit_sasl_authenticated
> reject_unauth_destination
> ...
Mayuresh:
> I am using postfix 3.1.4 on NetBSD 8.
>
> I am trying the idea of setting up a mailing list for a fairly static
> group of size not exceeding around 300, with postfix. I am doing this on a
> VPS server and want a solution that is conservative on resource footprint,
> hence considering
I am using postfix 3.1.4 on NetBSD 8.
I am trying the idea of setting up a mailing list for a fairly static
group of size not exceeding around 300, with postfix. I am doing this on a
VPS server and want a solution that is conservative on resource footprint,
hence considering doing it with MTA itse
15 matches
Mail list logo
