On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 02:45:41PM -0400, Philip Garrett wrote:
> On Oct 3, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> > Your best bet is a multi-instance configation, with separate inbound
> > and outbound mail processing.
>
> I was afraid of that.
>
> > You have a recipient-specific pol
On Oct 3, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Your best bet is a multi-instance configation, with separate inbound
> and outbound mail processing.
I was afraid of that.
> You have a recipient-specific policy, but Postfix content filtering
> happens at the message level on input, hence yo
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:49:11PM -0400, Philip Garrett wrote:
> I have a special-purpose Postfix 2.6 server that is part of a
> content conversion system. I would like to quarantine any outbound
> mail that hasn't been transformed properly. I'd also like to
> quarantine relay mail that hasn't g
On 10/3/2013 12:49 PM, Philip Garrett wrote:
> I have a special-purpose Postfix 2.6 server that is part of a content
> conversion system. I would like to quarantine any outbound mail that hasn't
> been transformed properly. I'd also like to quarantine relay mail that hasn't
> gone through the r
I have a special-purpose Postfix 2.6 server that is part of a content
conversion system. I would like to quarantine any outbound mail that hasn't
been transformed properly. I'd also like to quarantine relay mail that hasn't
gone through the reciprocal transformation.
I can hold the mail using
