The problem is tha there is that one VPS and I wanted 2nd opinions about
my dirty plan.
Thanks
On 2015-11-15 19:03, Matthew McGehrin wrote:
Is it possible to configure a 2nd VPS instance just for
fallback_relay? That way your primary queue is only for deliveries,
and your 2nd instance can handl
Is it possible to configure a 2nd VPS instance just for fallback_relay?
That way your primary queue is only for deliveries, and your 2nd
instance can handle the bounces.
I was working for an Online Gaming company and we would deliver 1-2
million messages per day, we had 3 active queues, and 1
On 13.11.2015 22:53, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 11/13/15 14:17, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
I got two options that I know of. Signifficantly shortening the queue
lifetime, or (not) losing the queue from the RAM disk.
Just trying to measure which is worse (or to hear something new for me)
If you l
On 11/13/15 14:17, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
> I got two options that I know of. Signifficantly shortening the queue
> lifetime, or (not) losing the queue from the RAM disk.
> Just trying to measure which is worse (or to hear something new for me)
If you lack disk space for the queue, the server in
Ok. As I mentioned, SSD is not an option on this project. Only RAM or
Raid 10 (shared with other VPSes)
On 13.11.2015 20:56, Ken Simpson wrote:
We deliver tens of millions per server per day using SSD spools...
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:18 AM Istvan Prosinger mailto:ist...@prosinger.net>> wrot
We deliver tens of millions per server per day using SSD spools...
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:18 AM Istvan Prosinger
wrote:
> I got two options that I know of. Signifficantly shortening the queue
> lifetime, or (not) losing the queue from the RAM disk.
> Just trying to measure which is worse (or
I got two options that I know of. Signifficantly shortening the queue
lifetime, or (not) losing the queue from the RAM disk.
Just trying to measure which is worse (or to hear something new for me)
On 13.11.2015 16:17, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 11/13/15 04:44, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
Hello,
I'
On 11/13/15 04:44, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll have a project to send 300-400k emails a day from a new IP address
> with one server. This can build up a signifficant mail queue on the
> server.
> We have several similar solutions already working but this time the idea
> is to have
On 13 November 2015 at 07:51, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
>
> The point here is that at the start of this, a temporary deferred mail
> queue will build up signifficantly pushing most of the load on the file
> system, and the idea is to speed up the queue processing to prevent killing
> the server (ex
On 2015-11-13 12:53, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
Em 13/11/15 08:09, Patrick Ben Koetter escreveu:
* Istvan Prosinger :
Hello,
I'll have a project to send 300-400k emails a day from a new IP
address with one server. This can build up a signifficant mail queue
on the server.
We have several simila
Em 13/11/15 08:09, Patrick Ben Koetter escreveu:
* Istvan Prosinger :
Hello,
I'll have a project to send 300-400k emails a day from a new IP
address with one server. This can build up a signifficant mail queue
on the server.
We have several similar solutions already working but this time the
id
Em 13/11/15 08:09, Patrick Ben Koetter escreveu:
* Istvan Prosinger :
Hello,
I'll have a project to send 300-400k emails a day from a new IP
address with one server. This can build up a signifficant mail queue
on the server.
We have several similar solutions already working but this time the
id
* Istvan Prosinger :
> Hello,
>
> I'll have a project to send 300-400k emails a day from a new IP
> address with one server. This can build up a signifficant mail queue
> on the server.
> We have several similar solutions already working but this time the
> idea is to have me do this on a VPS (no
Hello,
I'll have a project to send 300-400k emails a day from a new IP address
with one server. This can build up a signifficant mail queue on the
server.
We have several similar solutions already working but this time the idea
is to have me do this on a VPS (no SSD drives involved), h
14 matches
Mail list logo
