All clear ! thanks.
On Friday, March 17, 2017 5:19 PM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
* chaouche yacine 2017.03.17 14:52:
> Thank you Thomas, so if I understand correctly in Viktor's config dovecot is
> only used by postfix as a backend to query for valid virtual email addresses ?
Hi Yassine
* chaouche yacine 2017.03.17 14:52:
> Thank you Thomas, so if I understand correctly in Viktor's config dovecot is
> only used by postfix as a backend to query for valid virtual email addresses ?
Hi Yassine,
one of the benefits of using Dovecot's MDAs besides Sieve, is that they update
the me
> On Mar 17, 2017, at 9:52 AM, chaouche yacine wrote:
>
> Thank you Thomas, so if I understand correctly in Viktor's config dovecot is
> only used by postfix as a backend to query for valid virtual email addresses ?
Dovecot is used as an IMAP server. Postfix does maildir delivery.
--
Thank you Thomas, so if I understand correctly in Viktor's config dovecot is
only used by postfix as a backend to query for valid virtual email addresses ?
* chaouche yacine 2017.03.17 10:25:
> > Or similar, yes. I have:
> >
> >userdb {
> >args = uid=500 gid=500 home=/var/spool/virtual
> > mail=maildir:/var/spool/virtual/%n
> >driver = static
> >}
>
>
> Sorry for asking this on a postfix list but Viktor it seems all your users
>
On Thursday, March 16, 2017 4:09 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>> The problem is then getting dovecot to understand what to do with that
>> fully qualified user once it gets it. For my case, since the 'user' that
>> postfix is mapping to is the same as the local Unix user I want it delivered
>> to,
On Thu, 3/16/17, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Subject: Re: Problems with lmtp
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Thursday, March 16, 2017, 8:08 AM
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at
08:56:20AM +, Doug wrote:
> > The important thing to understan
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:56:20AM +, Doug wrote:
> > > $ postconf -d mail_version
> > >
> > > Yes, 3.1.0, thank you.
> >
> > Cool. I would expect that this likely contains backports of later
> > patches, but unfortunately the Linux distros tend to avoid backporting
> > upstre
On March 16, 2017 1:15:54 AM EDT, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:02:58AM +, Doug wrote:
>
>> $ postconf -d mail_version
>>
>> Yes, 3.1.0, thank you.
>
>Cool. I would expect that this likely contains backports of later
>patches, but unfortunately the Linux distro
Good news is that I solved the short term problem (delivery via lmtp now
works). More below. Lots of snipping to strip out what turned out to be the
irrelevant bits.
On Wed, 3/15/17, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Subject: Re: Problems with lmtp
To
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:02:58AM +, Doug wrote:
> $ postconf -d mail_version
>
> Yes, 3.1.0, thank you.
Cool. I would expect that this likely contains backports of later
patches, but unfortunately the Linux distros tend to avoid backporting
upstream version number updates, so it is
[ apologies to everyone for the formatting below, the Yahoo! webmail client is
simply awful ]
On Wed, 3/15/17, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Subject: Re: Problems with lmtp
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Wednesday, March 15, 2017, 7:29 PM
On Thu
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 02:06:37AM +, Doug wrote:
> [ Trying this again as I think I sent to the wrong address the first time ]
FWIW, it got through both times.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 02:01:07AM +, Doug wrote:
> I'm on Ubuntu Server 16.04 (up to date) and using the stock postfix packag
[ Trying this again as I think I sent to the wrong address the first time ]
Greetings,
First I'd like to say thank you to all of the developers and contributors to
Postfix. I've used it for many years with great success and happiness. :)
I'm on Ubuntu Server 16.04 (up to date) and using the sto
14 matches
Mail list logo
