Bastian Blank:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:21:57PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > There is code all over Postfix that sanity checks the syntax of
> > domains and address literals, and that code just cannot ever accept
> > datalink suffix junk.
>
> There is no junk in it.
>
> > That means having
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:21:57PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> There is code all over Postfix that sanity checks the syntax of
> domains and address literals, and that code just cannot ever accept
> datalink suffix junk.
There is no junk in it.
> That means having to strip off the junk where it
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:21:57PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> There is code all over Postfix that sanity checks the syntax of
> domains and address literals, and that code just cannot ever accept
> datalink suffix junk.
>
> That means having to strip off the junk where it gets into Postfix,
>
Bastian Blank:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:13:45PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Postfix CIDR support uses standard system library routines such as
> > inet_pton(). I am reluctant to re-invent Postfix-specific versions.
> > Maybe there is some other library that does not barf on this?
>
> The
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:13:45PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Postfix CIDR support uses standard system library routines such as
> inet_pton(). I am reluctant to re-invent Postfix-specific versions.
> Maybe there is some other library that does not barf on this?
The only parts of the glibc usi
On 08.11.2010 21:13, Wietse Venema wrote:
Hi Wietse,
Nov 8 17:15:46 lxmhs17 postfix/smtpd[15061]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[fe80::250:56ff:fea9:2c72%vlan6]: 550 5.7.1 Client host rejected:
cannot find your reverse hostname, [fe80::250:56ff:fea9:2c72%vlan6];
from=<> to= proto=ESMTP
h
Bernhard Schmidt:
> Nov 8 17:15:46 lxmhs17 postfix/smtpd[15061]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> unknown[fe80::250:56ff:fea9:2c72%vlan6]: 550 5.7.1 Client host rejected:
> cannot find your reverse hostname, [fe80::250:56ff:fea9:2c72%vlan6];
> from=<> to= proto=ESMTP
> helo=
How do these systems find
Hi,
postfix 2.7.1 on SLES 10.3 i586 (probably not important, but who knows).
We run a production mailserver with reject_unknown_client_hostname
enabled (for a few years now). To deal with the unavoidable
misconfigurations we have a very large whitelist which was created
automatically from yea
