Re: Postscreen is great !

2011-02-03 Thread Noel Jones
On 2/3/2011 1:59 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:52:47 -0600, Noel Jones wrote: list.dnswl.org*-5 this includes dnswl_none just a note I intentionally don't want to RBL block sometimes-legit hosts. To only whitelist low..high trusted hosts, something like: l

Re: Postscreen is great !

2011-02-03 Thread Wietse Venema
/dev/rob0: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:01:56PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Benny Pedersen: > > > super that its is supported, still missing rhsbl in postscreen ? > > > > There is not yet a user interface design for rhsbl in postscreen. > > Suggestions are welcome. > > I don't see how it woul

Re: Postscreen is great !

2011-02-03 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:01:56PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Benny Pedersen: > > super that its is supported, still missing rhsbl in postscreen ? > > There is not yet a user interface design for rhsbl in postscreen. > Suggestions are welcome. I don't see how it would be useful. The only thing

Re: Postscreen is great !

2011-02-03 Thread Wietse Venema
Benny Pedersen: > On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:52:47 -0600, Noel Jones > wrote: > > list.dnswl.org*-5 > > this includes dnswl_none just a note > > > hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.1*-5 > > super that its is supported, still missing rhsbl in postscreen ? There is not yet a us

Re: Postscreen is great !

2011-02-03 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:52:47 -0600, Noel Jones wrote: > list.dnswl.org*-5 this includes dnswl_none just a note > hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.1*-5 super that its is supported, still missing rhsbl in postscreen ?

Re: Postscreen is great !

2011-02-03 Thread Wietse Venema
Matt Rude: > On 2/3/2011 11:53 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote: > >> Just few words to say how postscreen is great ! > > > > The only drawback, which is minor from our point of view, but maybe > > major fo

Re: Postscreen is great !

2011-02-03 Thread Matt Rude
On 2/3/2011 11:53 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote: Just few words to say how postscreen is great ! The only drawback, which is minor from our point of view, but maybe major for the DNSBL operators, is that every connection means a hit on every

Re: Postscreen is great !

2011-02-03 Thread Noel Jones
On 2/3/2011 11:53 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote: Just few words to say how postscreen is great ! Thanks for that !!! Indeed, but I'd like to add some content to this thread and ask the list as a whole: 1. What are you using for dnsbl

Re: Postscreen is great !

2011-02-03 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote: > Just few words to say how postscreen is great ! > > Thanks for that !!! Indeed, but I'd like to add some content to this thread and ask the list as a whole: 1. What are you using for dnsbl sites and threshold? 2. Ha

Postscreen is great !

2011-02-03 Thread Frank Bonnet
Hello Just few words to say how postscreen is great ! Thanks for that !!!