On 12/11/2014 15:53, Wietse Venema wrote:
Birta Levente:
Just curiosity: it's not unwanted to check postscreen_dnsbl for an IP
which is blacklisted in postscreen_access_list?
Note: don't use no double negatives.
Wietse:
That would be a waste of Postfix resources. It would make Postfix less
re
Birta Levente:
> Just curiosity: it's not unwanted to check postscreen_dnsbl for an IP
> which is blacklisted in postscreen_access_list?
Note: don't use no double negatives.
Wietse:
> That would be a waste of Postfix resources. It would make Postfix less
> resistant against abuse from a known-bad
On 12/11/2014 14:21, Wietse Venema wrote:
Birta Levente:
Hi all
Just curiosity: it's not unwanted to check postscreen_dnsbl for an IP
which is blacklisted in postscreen_access_list?
That would be a waste of Postfix resources. It would make Postfix less
resistant against abuse from a known-bad
Birta Levente:
> Hi all
>
> Just curiosity: it's not unwanted to check postscreen_dnsbl for an IP
> which is blacklisted in postscreen_access_list?
That would be a waste of Postfix resources. It would make Postfix less
resistant against abuse from a known-bad netblock.
Wietse
> Nov 12 1
Hi all
Just curiosity: it's not unwanted to check postscreen_dnsbl for an IP
which is blacklisted in postscreen_access_list?
Nov 12 12:18:40 srv1 postfix/postscreen[26755]: CONNECT from
[94.177.23.227]:50497 to [176.223.199.54]:25
Nov 12 12:18:40 srv1 postfix/postscreen[26755]: BLACKLISTED
[