Emanuel writes:
Can the files header/body_checks generate overload?
On 19.04.18 00:05, micah wrote:
Yes.
I recently tried to load the malware patrol header check list, which has
49349 lines as a regexp body check, and I quickly had to stop doing that
because the resource usage of the machine
On 19 April 2018 at 07:21, Peer Heinlein wrote:
>
> You can save a lot of cpu ressources if you use...
>
> ...pcre instead of regexp (mostly the syntax is the same, but the engine
> is better, just change the prefix!)
Check if supported with:
# postconf -m|grep pcre
pcre
If using the standard po
Am 18.04.2018 um 20:51 schrieb Emanuel:
> Can the files header/body_checks generate overload?
If you have many header/body_checks you'll see a higher usage of the
cleanup process in tools like "top".
You can save a lot of cpu ressources if you use...
...pcre instead of regexp (mostly the syntax
Emanuel writes:
> Can the files header/body_checks generate overload?
Yes.
I recently tried to load the malware patrol header check list, which has
49349 lines as a regexp body check, and I quickly had to stop doing that
because the resource usage of the machine quickly went into a state
where
> On Apr 18, 2018, at 2:51 PM, Emanuel wrote:
>
> smtpd_recipient_limit = 20
RFC5321 requires at least 100. Unnecessarily splitting the envelope does not
help performance.
--
Viktor.
Emanuel:
> Can the files header/body_checks generate overload?
I have not seen evidence that the cleanup daemon is responsible for
a performance issue. Absent meaningful info, no support.
Wietse
Can the files header/body_checks generate overload?
Postfix configuration:
default_process_limit = 300
smtpd_client_connection_count_limit = 2000
smtpd_recipient_limit = 20
Any information you give me is helpful.
El 18/04/18 a las 14:00, Wietse Venema escribió:
Limit the number of processe
Emanuel:
[ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
> Hello everyone, I'm representing a performance problem on my server.
>
> I explain in detail the configuration of my server.
>
> I am using postfix with 46 IPs configured as a mta, with round-robin, in
> the master.cf file
>
> I think the "cleanu
El 18/04/18 a las 12:03, Matus UHLAR - fantomas escribió:
On 18.04.18 11:00, Emanuel wrote:
Hello everyone, I'm representing a performance problem on my server.
I explain in detail the configuration of my server.
I am using postfix with 46 IPs configured as a mta, with round-robin,
in the m
On 18.04.18 11:00, Emanuel wrote:
Hello everyone, I'm representing a performance problem on my server.
I explain in detail the configuration of my server.
I am using postfix with 46 IPs configured as a mta, with round-robin,
in the master.cf file
46 IPs? why?
I think the "cleanup" process
Hello everyone, I'm representing a performance problem on my server.
I explain in detail the configuration of my server.
I am using postfix with 46 IPs configured as a mta, with round-robin, in
the master.cf file
I think the "cleanup" process is responsible for the excessive use of cpu.
ps f
11 matches
Mail list logo
