On 24/08/13 17:35, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:13:46PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
The search was looking up a group with a particular address. It
is a mistake to impute any other meaning to the domain part of the
group email address.
Why is it a mistake?
Your mistake i
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:13:46PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> >The search was looking up a group with a particular address. It
> >is a mistake to impute any other meaning to the domain part of the
> >group email address.
>
> Why is it a mistake?
Your mistake is to use objects with multiple e
On 24/08/13 03:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 03:01:52PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
dn: CN=albert,CN=Users,DC=example,DC=com
otherMailbox: alb...@example.com
otherMailbox: alb...@domain1.com
otherMailbox: alb...@domain2.com
The only problem that I have found is, any LDAP s
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 03:01:52PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> dn: CN=albert,CN=Users,DC=example,DC=com
> otherMailbox: alb...@example.com
> otherMailbox: alb...@domain1.com
> otherMailbox: alb...@domain2.com
>
> The only problem that I have found is, any LDAP search with
> 'result_attribute =
On 19/08/13 23:15, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:32:27PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
If you want to return
a particular single address for each user, you need to select a
result attribute that contains *only* that address.
That is what I was trying to do, do a search of a g
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:32:27PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> >If you want to return
> >a particular single address for each user, you need to select a
> >result attribute that contains *only* that address.
>
> That is what I was trying to do, do a search of a group, get its
> members and retu
On 19/08/13 22:14, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:08:18PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
There is no such thing as "the relevant email addresses", all
addresses selected by the filter and result attributes are equally
relevant.
When I said "the relevant email addresses", I mean
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:08:18PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> >There is no such thing as "the relevant email addresses", all
> >addresses selected by the filter and result attributes are equally
> >relevant.
>
> When I said "the relevant email addresses", I meant, get from the
> group members
On 19/08/13 20:11, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 07:51:50PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
On 19/08/13 19:28, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 06:25:24PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
query_filter= (&(objectclass=group)(mail=%s))
leaf_result_attribute = otherMa
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 07:51:50PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 19/08/13 19:28, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 06:25:24PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> >
> >>query_filter= (&(objectclass=group)(mail=%s))
> >>leaf_result_attribute = otherMailbox
> >>special_result_attri
On 19/08/13 19:28, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 06:25:24PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
query_filter= (&(objectclass=group)(mail=%s))
leaf_result_attribute = otherMailbox
special_result_attribute = member
I have added a couple of otherMailbox attributes to a user called
fre
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 06:25:24PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> query_filter= (&(objectclass=group)(mail=%s))
> leaf_result_attribute = otherMailbox
> special_result_attribute = member
> I have added a couple of otherMailbox attributes to a user called
> fred, one is f...@example.com, the ot
Hello,
I am trying to setup a postfix mailserver using a Samba4 AD server as
the LDAP source and I am struggling with groups.
I have created an OU called domains and then created a mailgroup called
example.com in this OU, I then added added a mail attribute
mailgr...@example.com to the group
13 matches
Mail list logo
