On 10.04.2017 18:33, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Mon, April 10, 2017 11:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> James B. Byrne:
>>> The issue seems to be some sort of time-out with the Amavis proxy.
>>> 66 Apr 8 10:50:27 inet08 postfix-p25/smtpd[18374]: warning:
>>> timeout talking to proxy 127.0.0.1
James B. Byrne:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 converted... ]
>
> On Mon, April 10, 2017 11:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > James B. Byrne:
> >> 66 Apr 8 10:50:27 inet08 postfix-p25/smtpd[18374]: warning:
> >> timeout talking to proxy 127.0.0.1:10024
> >> 67 Apr 8 10:50:27 inet08 postfix-p25/smtpd[
On Mon, April 10, 2017 11:29, Wietse Venema wrote:
> James B. Byrne:
>> 66 Apr 8 10:50:27 inet08 postfix-p25/smtpd[18374]: warning:
>> timeout talking to proxy 127.0.0.1:10024
>> 67 Apr 8 10:50:27 inet08 postfix-p25/smtpd[18374]:
>> proxy-reject:
>> END-OF-MESSAGE: 451 4.3.0 Error: que
James B. Byrne:
> 66 Apr 8 10:50:27 inet08 postfix-p25/smtpd[18374]: warning:
> timeout talking to proxy 127.0.0.1:10024
> 67 Apr 8 10:50:27 inet08 postfix-p25/smtpd[18374]: proxy-reject:
> END-OF-MESSAGE: 451 4.3.0 Error: queue file write error; from=
> to= proto=ESMTP helo=
The spam
We continue to receive messages addressed to Postmaster from our MX
host. All appear to be related to a single original transmission.
The issue seems to be some sort of time-out with the Amavis proxy.
Is there some way of determining exactly what is wrong with this
specific sender's message?
T