On Dec 17, 2008, at 11:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
What are the application-visible changes? If one relies on BIND
etc. for validation, where does DNSSEC affect the application?
Postfix uses the standard resolver library but these calls are
entirely encapsulated in a single module.
First of
Wietse Venema escribió:
> klondike:
>
>> Bernhard Fischer escribi?:
>>
>>> I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
>>> I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
>>> cares about it.
>>> The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs
>
On Thursday 18 December 2008, Patrick Vande Walle wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:42:55 +0100, Bernhard Fischer
>
> wrote:
> > I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> > I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
> >
> > cares about it.
> > The most recent patch for Po
On Wednesday 17 December 2008, mouss wrote:
> Bernhard Fischer a écrit :
> > I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> > I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
> > cares about it.
> > The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs
> > (libv
On Wednesday 17 December 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
> klondike:
> > Bernhard Fischer escribi?:
> > > I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> > > I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody
> > > really cares about it.
> > > The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 03:00:40PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:59:27PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > Postfix uses res_search(3). DNSSEC would have to be supported by the
> > C-library stub resolver code, not Postfix.
>
> DNSSEC can be checked by the recursive reso
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:59:27PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> Postfix uses res_search(3). DNSSEC would have to be supported by the
> C-library stub resolver code, not Postfix.
DNSSEC can be checked by the recursive resolver, which is sufficient in
most setups.
> DNSSEC is very complex. I rat
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:42:55 +0100, Bernhard Fischer
wrote:
> I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
> cares about it.
> The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs
> (libval, libsres) I didn
klondike:
> Bernhard Fischer escribi?:
> > I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> > I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
> > cares about it.
> > The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs
> > (libval, libsres) I didn't find any d
Bernhard Fischer a écrit :
> I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
> cares about it.
> The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs
> (libval, libsres) I didn't find any download page for.
>
>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 08:55:04PM +0100, klondike wrote:
> Bernhard Fischer escribi?:
> > I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> > I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
> > cares about it.
> > The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based o
Bernhard Fischer escribió:
> I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
> cares about it.
> The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs
> (libval, libsres) I didn't find any download page for.
>
>
I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
cares about it.
The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs
(libval, libsres) I didn't find any download page for.
Is there any recent development going on
13 matches
Mail list logo
