oh damn it...
i don't mean the MTA i think i mean MDA?
i would suggest to check MX-record or/and reply-to or/and SMTP mail from
so postfix can (maybe)probe only postmas...@doamin.tld and cache the result
Am 20.11.19 um 15:01 schrieb Wietse Venema:
Philipp Ewald:
BTW:
by reject_unverified_send
Philipp Ewald:
> BTW:
> by reject_unverified_sender:
> would it not be better to check sending server? like accept connection
> on port 25 not whole sender? this way dont work with mailing list ( it
> would but its produce many mail probing)
That would be immensely stupid idea. First, there is n
Hi folks,
i have just installed postfix on Debian 10 and want to test "SMTP VRFY
Command"
i have noticed that postfix only probing a mail to vrfy the recipient.
Is there any another way as probing mail delivery?
at this point we use a custom script ( we want only "default-tools")
BTW:
by rej
On Sat, July 25, 2009 19:41, mouss wrote:
> That said, I personally disable it because I don't see the value it
> brings. but that doesn't make me feel more secure.
you prefer to see the probe email if probed ? :)
maybe i dont understand the power of vrfy :/
--
xpoint
On Sat, July 25, 2009 19:00, Damian Myerscough wrote:
> VRFY command because it allow attackers to see what users
> were valid e.g. local users could be identified.
imho it does not make sense, what happend if sender try sending email to
recipient and parse the results ?
--
xpoint
Damian Myerscough a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I have been recently playing with Postfix a lot and I was curious of the
> consequences of disabling the VRFY command. I have disabled the
> VRFY command because it allow attackers to see what users
> were valid e.g. local users could be identified.
>
the
Hello,
I have been recently playing with Postfix a lot and I was curious of the
consequences of disabling the VRFY command. I have disabled the
VRFY command because it allow attackers to see what users
were valid e.g. local users could be identified.
--
Regards,
Damian Myerscough
