Thanks Noel. This sounds like a good clue the gmail app is used with a
custom SMTP server, which would be our mail relay... I will try and
reproduce this. I would expect the source IP address of the SMTP traffic to
be the client's device though, not Google's.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019, 2:18 PM Noe
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6078445
On 4/30/2019 10:54 AM, Mohamed Lrhazi wrote:
I hope you guys don't mind me asking here about a non Postfix issue.
I find this in the logs of our mail relay server. We are using
google's GSuite, but have a relay for some use cases...
Apr 30 0
I hope you guys don't mind me asking here about a non Postfix issue.
I find this in the logs of our mail relay server. We are using google's
GSuite, but have a relay for some use cases...
Apr 30 09:03:59 idp-prod-2 postfix/qmgr[5631]: 02EBF3A402: removed
Apr 30 09:03:59 idp-prod-2 postfix/smtp[2
On 29 May 2018, at 11:57, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> The collation rules for "en_US" are abominable. I always set:
>
> LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LANG=C
Yep, strongly agree with this. I foolishly had LANG=en_US some time back
thinking it was sensible. It is not. Everything breaks.
On 1/30/2016 9:51 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> When amavis tags a message for quarantine, what exactly does that mean? Where
> does the message go?
>
> It appears to send the message to the LDA normally.
When a message is tagged, amavisd delivers the message normally but
includes **SPAM** or similar in
When amavis tags a message for quarantine, what exactly does that mean? Where
does the message go?
It appears to send the message to the LDA normally.
Also, does amavis call spamd directly and if so should the spam lines still
appear in maillog or am I running amavis AND spamd?
So, two stupid
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 2:33 AM, furio ercolessi wrote:
>
> Their recommended setting is
>
> reject_rhsbl_client dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1.[2..99],
> reject_rhsbl_sender dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1.[2..99],
> reject_rhsbl_helo dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1.[2..99]
>
> Return code
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 06:08:40PM -0700, Steve Jenkins wrote:
>
> This is expanding a bit on Elijah's OP, but here are my current
> restrictions that I've been running for a while:
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> [...]
> reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
> reject_rhsbl_cl
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Elijah Savage
wrote:
> Again thanks for all the great recommendations, I now have a few ways of
> trying to combat this if my plan doesn't work.
>
> I have a utilized my spam filtering agent combined with a no rDNS rule and
> increased the score of that rule.
>
>
but
there is a postfix question
On 6/1/2015 1:28 PM, Rich Wales wrote:
>
>> The reject_non_fqdn_hostname restriction will not block any of these.
>
> How about reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname instead? This one is
> supposed to reject clients with no IP-address-to-n
On 6/1/2015 1:28 PM, Rich Wales wrote:
>
>> The reject_non_fqdn_hostname restriction will not block any of these.
>
> How about reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname instead? This one is
> supposed to reject clients with no IP-address-to-name mapping.
>
> Rich Wales
> ri...@richw.org
>
Yes,
> The reject_non_fqdn_hostname restriction will not block any of these.
How about reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname instead? This one is
supposed to reject clients with no IP-address-to-name mapping.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
Elijah Savage:
> I am seeing thousands of spam messages beginning on Thursday of last week
> from the same subnet. I know it is not best practice to fight spam by
> outright blocking ip addresses but I am seeing this across multiple domains
> in different parts of the country. The easy and immediat
-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Noel Jones
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 1:30 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Anyone else seeing an increase in spam? -- Sort of off topic
but there is a postfix question
On 6/1/2015 11:09 AM, Elijah Savage wrote:
> I am seeing thousands of s
On 6/1/2015 11:09 AM, Elijah Savage wrote:
> I am seeing thousands of spam messages beginning on Thursday of last
> week from the same subnet. I know it is not best practice to fight
> spam by outright blocking ip addresses but I am seeing this across
> multiple domains in different parts of the co
Futchko, Rose:
> > This message was RETURNED TO your mailman service.
> > That does not prove that it was SENT FROM your mailman service.
>
> That is a great point. So, I dug a little deeper into the mail log and
> found what I believe is the outbound information:
>
> Oct 1 09:39:07 company-app0
> This message was RETURNED TO your mailman service.
> That does not prove that it was SENT FROM your mailman service.
That is a great point. So, I dug a little deeper into the mail log and
found what I believe is the outbound information:
Oct 1 09:39:07 company-app02-listserv postfix/smtpd[3961
> From: LinkedIn Connections
> To: southeastern-michigan-chapter-owner
>
> Message-ID:
> <717884137.7030508.8325486322321.javamail@ela6-app9640.prod>
> Subject: You have been sent a file (Filename: Southeastern-77.pdf)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>
My apologies -- I forgot to change the subject line last night. This is
a resend of the question below.
---
I have a question for this POSTFIX group dealing with SPAM. We currently
have a Postfix - Mailman - SYMANTEC Cloud (VIRUS / SPAM FILTER)
configuration.
The M
not, what is the preferred way?
Thank you.
===
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Reindl Harald
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 1:22 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Postfix question on transport
would you PLEASE stop writing HTML mails to lists?
there are people out there with heatlh troubles
on their eyes who likes to cinfigure their client
how they need to display fonts
Am 15.08.2012 19:16, schrieb Futchko:
>
> Good Afternoon,
>
>
>
> I have a hopefully simple question that can be an
Good Afternoon,
I have a hopefully simple question that can be answered. I have POSTFIX
and MAILMAN on the same server, of which they are working fine together.
Currently, my mail list is sending mail out with an email URL of -
x...@mail-test.company.org
I want to keep the main mail th
Thank you for answer my question
Hotmail email server is just for example. Maybe so many email server that
not in the china have these problems.
The question is, in China, the government have special firewall “ great
firewall of china”, It make me can not reach the mail server who do not put
the
On Jun 7, 2012, at 08:09, Feel Zhou wrote:
> My purpose is :
>
> Use ServerA, try it best, send email to hotmail,
>
> if working, very good, if not (such as reject, defer ), then give the email
> to ServerB.
>
> Do not use ServerB all the time.
Do not resend mail that was rejected via anothe
Hi, My friend
I got your email address from postmaster@postfix,org
I'm from China, Sorry about my English
I learning postfix for few month, and I think it is the best mail server.
But there is some problem that I can't solve it, can you help me?
For example: ServerA and ServerB , inst
rom: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 12:36 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: Postfix Question: strange issue with mx record lookup
>
> Andreas Freyvogel:
> > Th
Venema
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 12:36 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Postfix Question: strange issue with mx record lookup
Andreas Freyvogel:
> The email address to which we are sending is "u...@mmm.com".
Postfix will send to the A record for mmm.com if MX lookup is
disab
Reindl Harald:
> this are EIGHT releases behind the last supported F14
> and 5 years ago - normally i would expect that someone
> updates to supported versions of software before try
> to solve problems with since years not supported versions
The DNS lookup code has not changed. Looking up an MX
r
Andreas Freyvogel:
> The email address to which we are sending is "u...@mmm.com".
Postfix will send to the A record for mmm.com if MX lookup is
disabled, or if MX lookup results in a "not found" response (either
NXDOMAIN or NODATA).
Postfix does not send to the A record if MX fails due to any oth
ostfix.org
> Subject: Re: Postfix Question: strange issue with mx record lookup
>
>
>
> Am 12.09.2011 21:11, schrieb Andreas Freyvogel:
>> The email address to which we are sending is "u...@mmm.com".
>>
>> Output of my postconf -n:
>>
>>
@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Postfix Question: strange issue with mx record lookup
Am 12.09.2011 21:11, schrieb Andreas Freyvogel:
> The email address to which we are sending is "u...@mmm.com".
>
> Output of my postconf -n:
>
> readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.2.10/REA
Am 12.09.2011 21:11, schrieb Andreas Freyvogel:
> The email address to which we are sending is "u...@mmm.com".
>
> Output of my postconf -n:
>
> readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.2.10/README_FILES
> relay_domains = $mydestination, /etc/postfix/relay-domains
> sample_directory = /usr/sha
er-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 12:07 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Postfix Question: strange issue with mx record lookup
Andreas Freyvogel:
> I have a bit of an odd problem and hoped you might be
Andreas Freyvogel:
> I have a bit of an odd problem and hoped you might be able to offer some
> assistance or point me in the right direction.
>
> Yesterday, my server was unable to send emails to 3M (u...@mmm.com).
>
> The logs shows:
> "status=deferred (delivery temporarily suspended: connect t
Am 12.09.2011 20:31, schrieb Andreas Freyvogel:
> I have a bit of an odd problem and hoped you might be able to offer some
> assistance or point me in the right direction.
>
> Yesterday, my server was unable to send emails to 3M (u...@mmm.com).
>
> The logs shows:
> "status=deferred (delivery tem
I have a bit of an odd problem and hoped you might be able to offer some
assistance or point me in the right direction.
Yesterday, my server was unable to send emails to 3M (u...@mmm.com).
The logs shows:
"status=deferred (delivery temporarily suspended: connect to
mmm.com[192.28.34.26]"
When I
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:48:05AM +0200, mouss wrote:
> Bounces go the envelope sender of the message. your best option is to
> get the web developpers to set the right envelope sender.
Amen. A lot of otherwise competent and knowledgeable people
simply don't even begin to think about error checki
JR Swartz:
> I established MX records for each of the virtual domains and email is
> flowing fine. However, when web site owners send newsletters out from their
> web site content management systems, the undeliverable emails get sent to
> root on the webserver instead of being sent to the owners v
Le 28/04/2011 00:03, JR Swartz a écrit :
>
>
> For several years my small business used one large apache web server
> (virtual hosts)/email server combined with Postfix. Recently I split the
> two into their own separate servers. I have a webserver.domain.com and
> mailserver.domain.com.
>
>
For several years my small business used one large apache web server
(virtual hosts)/email server combined with Postfix. Recently I split the
two into their own separate servers. I have a webserver.domain.com and
mailserver.domain.com.
I established MX records for each of the virtual domai
Admin a écrit :
> OK, I know I did something wrong here. I downloaded, compiled and
> installed (I Thought) Postfix, and I THOUGHT it became my default MTA
> but evidently not.
>
redhat systems have the "alternatives" program:
# alternatives --set mta /path/to/postfix-sendmail
> I am running
OK, I know I did something wrong here. I downloaded, compiled and installed
(I Thought) Postfix, and I THOUGHT it became my default MTA but evidently
not.
I am running Centos 4.7 with cPanel., and I know this can be done, since I
used to run a dedi that had that setup.
If any one would be so
42 matches
Mail list logo
