On 1/6/2012 8:35 PM, Eric Lemings wrote:
> Current 'postconf -n' output:
>
> command_directory = /usr/sbin
This is likely your default. Check with 'postconf -d command_directory'
and remove this line if it is. Don't re-specify default values in
main.cf. It simply clutters things up making sle
On Jan 6, 2012, at 5:15 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/6/2012 3:05 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
>> [root@myhost postfix]$ dig 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. any
> ...
>> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. 900 IN A 127.0.0.2
>> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org.
On 1/6/2012 3:05 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
> [root@myhost postfix]$ dig 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. any
...
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. 900 IN A 127.0.0.2
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. 900 IN A 127.0.0.10
> 2.0.0.127.zen.spam
On Jan 5, 2012, at 2:33 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/4/2012 10:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
>> You could consolidate all of your restrictions into
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions. Unless you need complex whitelisting,
>> it's usually easier that way, to only maintain one set of
>> restriction
On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
> ...
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>
> BTW "client" != "recipient", in case that is what you meant by
> duplicated settings. They are different settings, but functionally
> similar. Yo
On 5 January 2012 11:24, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were
set
[ subject changed to be relevant to the thread ]
On Thursday 05 January 2012 10:24:11 Eric Lemings wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Eric Lemings
> wrote:
> > This change seems to have been my missing link. Since I made
> > it, spam arriving in IMAP boxes has dropped drastically in the
> > p
On 1/5/2012 10:24 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
> Well I spoke too soon. The flood of spam started again this morning.
>
> Obviously something isn't working. All testimonials I've read say that grey
> listing stops 90% of spam but its not working.
>
> Eric.
How effective any particular anti-spam
On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
>>> I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were
>>> set twice, the latter of which was overriding the former.
On 1/5/2012 12:46 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
> The RBL sites come from various Postfix tutorials on the web, many of which
> are getting woefully dated. Thanks for the updates.
First, please use the generic term "dnsbl" instead of "RBL". RBL is a
copyrighted/trademarked term specific to MAPS Corp
On 1/4/2012 10:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> You could consolidate all of your restrictions into
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions. Unless you need complex whitelisting,
> it's usually easier that way, to only maintain one set of
> restrictions.
I recommend this as well. For me it's much easier to w
On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
>> I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were
>> set twice, the latter of which was overriding the former. Here's
>> the new values:
>
> The list policy asks for "pos
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 20:45:23 Eric Lemings wrote:
> I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were
> set twice, the latter of which was overriding the former. Here's
> the new values:
The list policy asks for "postconf -n" because that reports values
Postfix is actual
On Jan 4, 2012, at 8:21 PM, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
> Here's my Postfix configuration:
>
> [root@myhost myuser]$ postconf -n
> snip
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> On 1/4/2012 11:31 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Can anyone point me to some good guides/t
I just noticed that two of my Postfix configuration variables were set twice,
the latter of which was overriding the former. Here's the new values:
smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworkspermit_sasl_authenticated
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.orgreject_rbl_client rbl-plus.mai
Here's my Postfix configuration:
[root@myhost myuser]$ postconf -n
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
enable_server_options = yes
header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfi
On 1/4/2012 11:31 AM, Eric Lemings wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Can anyone point me to some good guides/tutorials for configuring Postfix on
> Mac systems? In particular, I'm trying to stop spam in its tracks. I've
> tried using the Server app and the older Server Admin app. I've even tried
> man
Greetings,
Can anyone point me to some good guides/tutorials for configuring Postfix on
Mac systems? In particular, I'm trying to stop spam in its tracks. I've tried
using the Server app and the older Server Admin app. I've even tried manually
editing the Postfix config files by hand. Nothi
18 matches
Mail list logo
