On 2010-02-16 7:30 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>> I wasn't the one posting the link, but I checked it when DJ Lucas posted
>> it and checked it again just now, and it does have a visible answer (at
>> the bottom of the page).
> Yes, but for posterity and archives, Ansgar is correct and LuKreme is
> wr
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-02-16 LuKreme wrote:
> > On 16-Feb-2010, at 12:11, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> >> On 2010-02-16 LuKreme wrote:
> >>> On 15-Feb-2010, at 03:23, Barney Desmond wrote:
> Experts Exchange is viewable (at least) from google searches.
> >>>
> >>> N
On 2010-02-16 LuKreme wrote:
> On 16-Feb-2010, at 12:11, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
>> On 2010-02-16 LuKreme wrote:
>>> On 15-Feb-2010, at 03:23, Barney Desmond wrote:
Experts Exchange is viewable (at least) from google searches.
>>>
>>> No it isn't.
>>
>> Yes it is.
>
> The link you posted had no
On 16-Feb-2010, at 12:11, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2010-02-16 LuKreme wrote:
On 15-Feb-2010, at 03:23, Barney Desmond wrote:
Experts Exchange is viewable (at least) from google searches.
No it isn't.
Yes it is.
The link you posted had no visible answer. It had a banner about
signing up
On 2010-02-16 LuKreme wrote:
> On 15-Feb-2010, at 03:23, Barney Desmond wrote:
>> Experts Exchange is viewable (at least) from google searches.
>
> No it isn't.
Yes it is. It's also viewable if you change your browser's user agent
string to that of a search engine spider. How else do you think the
On 15-Feb-2010, at 03:23, Barney Desmond wrote:
Experts Exchange is viewable (at least) from google searches.
No it isn't. Experts Exchange is such a complete scam that I have it
blocked in my local /etc/hosts and excluded from google search results.
On 2010-02-15 5:23 AM, Barney Desmond wrote:
> Apologies for pushing the OT thread.
>
> Experts Exchange is viewable (at least) from google searches. I'm
> pretty sure it's a referer-check, used to get plenty of good
> google-juice for their content. As a convenient side-effect, you can
> always s
On 15 February 2010 18:41, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> I can't get to it without entering a CC and starting a 30 day trial. The
> "bottom" of the page is white space. I see no options anywhere on the page to
> get at the info without signing up. This is kinda by design isn't it? No
> pay,
> no pla