On 2010-02-16 7:30 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>> I wasn't the one posting the link, but I checked it when DJ Lucas posted
>> it and checked it again just now, and it does have a visible answer (at
>> the bottom of the page).
> Yes, but for posterity and archives, Ansgar is correct and LuKreme is
> wr
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-02-16 LuKreme wrote:
> > On 16-Feb-2010, at 12:11, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> >> On 2010-02-16 LuKreme wrote:
> >>> On 15-Feb-2010, at 03:23, Barney Desmond wrote:
> Experts Exchange is viewable (at least) from google searches.
> >>>
> >>> N
On 2010-02-16 LuKreme wrote:
> On 16-Feb-2010, at 12:11, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
>> On 2010-02-16 LuKreme wrote:
>>> On 15-Feb-2010, at 03:23, Barney Desmond wrote:
Experts Exchange is viewable (at least) from google searches.
>>>
>>> No it isn't.
>>
>> Yes it is.
>
> The link you posted had no
On 16-Feb-2010, at 12:11, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2010-02-16 LuKreme wrote:
On 15-Feb-2010, at 03:23, Barney Desmond wrote:
Experts Exchange is viewable (at least) from google searches.
No it isn't.
Yes it is.
The link you posted had no visible answer. It had a banner about
signing up
On 2010-02-16 LuKreme wrote:
> On 15-Feb-2010, at 03:23, Barney Desmond wrote:
>> Experts Exchange is viewable (at least) from google searches.
>
> No it isn't.
Yes it is. It's also viewable if you change your browser's user agent
string to that of a search engine spider. How else do you think the
On 15-Feb-2010, at 03:23, Barney Desmond wrote:
Experts Exchange is viewable (at least) from google searches.
No it isn't. Experts Exchange is such a complete scam that I have it
blocked in my local /etc/hosts and excluded from google search results.
;> >From: Jafaruddin Lie
>> >To: Daniel V. Reinhardt
>> >Sent: Mon, February 15, 2010 10:50:07 PM
>> >Subject: Re: Postfix - Timeout While Sending End of Data
>> >
>> >
>> >Currently we have mails going to our internal mail server b
ws_scaling on the server, we'll see if this
keeps on happening.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Daniel V. Reinhardt
wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> >From: Jafaruddin Lie
> >To: Daniel V. Reinhardt
> >Sent: Mon, February 15, 2010 10:50:07 PM
> >Su
>
>From: Jafaruddin Lie
>To: Daniel V. Reinhardt
>Sent: Mon, February 15, 2010 10:50:07 PM
>Subject: Re: Postfix - Timeout While Sending End of Data
>
>
>Currently we have mails going to our internal mail server being queued up.
>
>So, to answer your question, it
2010/2/16 Jafaruddin Lie :
> So here's an update:
> 1. I have turned off fixup smtp and checked that inspect esmtp or inspect
> smtp is not running.
> 2. I have also enabled ICMP for both ends from our DMZ mail server and
> internal mail server. It is still happening.
well, try to disable tcp-wind
So here's an update:
1. I have turned off fixup smtp and checked that inspect esmtp or inspect
smtp is not running.
2. I have also enabled ICMP for both ends from our DMZ mail server and
internal mail server. It is still happening.
Plot thickens huh.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:22 PM, DJ Lucas wro
On 2010-02-15 5:23 AM, Barney Desmond wrote:
> Apologies for pushing the OT thread.
>
> Experts Exchange is viewable (at least) from google searches. I'm
> pretty sure it's a referer-check, used to get plenty of good
> google-juice for their content. As a convenient side-effect, you can
> always s
$quoted_author = "Stan Hoeppner" ;
>
> >> DJ Lucas put forth on 2/15/2010 1:22 AM:
> >>
> >>> http://www.experts-exchange.com/Security/Software_Firewalls/Enterprise_Firewalls/Cisco_PIX_Firewall/Q_24438893.html
>
> I can't get to it without entering a CC and starting a 30 day trial. The
> "bot
On 15 February 2010 18:41, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> I can't get to it without entering a CC and starting a 30 day trial. The
> "bottom" of the page is white space. I see no options anywhere on the page to
> get at the info without signing up. This is kinda by design isn't it? No
> pay,
> no pla
DJ Lucas put forth on 2/15/2010 1:33 AM:
> On 02/15/2010 01:30 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> DJ Lucas put forth on 2/15/2010 1:22 AM:
>>
>>
>>> http://www.experts-exchange.com/Security/Software_Firewalls/Enterprise_Firewalls/Cisco_PIX_Firewall/Q_24438893.html
>>>
>> Never post links to inform
On 02/15/2010 01:30 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> DJ Lucas put forth on 2/15/2010 1:22 AM:
>
>
>> http://www.experts-exchange.com/Security/Software_Firewalls/Enterprise_Firewalls/Cisco_PIX_Firewall/Q_24438893.html
>>
> Never post links to information that requires a credit card in order to vie
DJ Lucas put forth on 2/15/2010 1:22 AM:
> http://www.experts-exchange.com/Security/Software_Firewalls/Enterprise_Firewalls/Cisco_PIX_Firewall/Q_24438893.html
Never post links to information that requires a credit card in order to view it.
I'm sure this breaks one if not many netiquette rules. ;
On 02/14/2010 10:17 PM, Jafaruddin Lie wrote:
>
> We do have a CISCO ASA 5520 that the outgoing mailserver sits behind,
> and I have done the no fixup protocol on the box to no avail.
> I have also enabled ICMP from that box to our internal mail server,
> and ping works so I figure the ICMP NO-FRAG
Our Postfix server (RHEL 4, stock-standard RPM) is playing up at the moment.
The mail server is our outgoing mail server (on the DMZ), and I noticed that
since last weekend we're having this issue:
A lot of the mails generated by our web applications (and manually, may I
add) were being queued up
19 matches
Mail list logo
