Robert Ober escribió:
On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:58, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática
wrote:
Well, it came from dovecot.org :) Maybe I misunderstood your question,
please let me know. I'm running Postfix 2.3.x and Dovecot 1.0.
My "problem" was a confusing configuration. I mean, s
On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:58, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática y> wrote:
Well, it came from dovecot.org :) Maybe I misunderstood your
question, please let me know. I'm running Postfix 2.3.x and Dovecot
1.0.
My "problem" was a confusing configuration. I mean, settings things
up
Robert A. Ober escribió:
On 3/4/2009 10:05 AM, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática wrote:
Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:35:38AM -0200, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de
Matem?tica wrote:
The user was not "relaying": mail was sent to a domain you are
responsible
for, so t
On 3/4/2009 10:05 AM, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática wrote:
Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:35:38AM -0200, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de
Matem?tica wrote:
The user was not "relaying": mail was sent to a domain you are
responsible
for, so this was not blocked by "re
Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:35:38AM -0200, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de
Matem?tica wrote:
The user was not "relaying": mail was sent to a domain you are responsible
for, so this was not blocked by "reject_unauth_destination".
Well... I don't think so, maybe I am not und
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:40:51AM -0200, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de
Matem?tica wrote:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/bloqueados
> permit_mynetworks
> permit_sasl_authenticated
> reject_unauth_destination
> reje
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:35:38AM -0200, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de
Matem?tica wrote:
>> The user was not "relaying": mail was sent to a domain you are responsible
>> for, so this was not blocked by "reject_unauth_destination".
>
> Well... I don't think so, maybe I am not understandig
> reject
Noel Jones escribió:
Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática wrote:
Dear users, I realized today that the local SMTP server is not working
as expected.
I found these lines in the log files:
Mar 2 22:42:48 smtp postfix/smtpd[30427]: 1A66913105B:
client=r190-134-zz-xx.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.
Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 12:29:29AM -0200, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de
Matem?tica wrote:
Mar 2 18:42:02 smtp postfix/smtpd[15652]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
r190-134-zz-xx.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy[190.134.zz.
xx]: 450 4.7.1 : Recipient address rejected:
Greylisti
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 12:29:29AM -0200, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de
Matem?tica wrote:
> Mar 2 18:42:02 smtp postfix/smtpd[15652]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> r190-134-zz-xx.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy[190.134.zz.
> xx]: 450 4.7.1 : Recipient address rejected:
> Greylisting in action, please
Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática wrote:
Dear users, I realized today that the local SMTP server is not working
as expected.
I found these lines in the log files:
Mar 2 22:42:48 smtp postfix/smtpd[30427]: 1A66913105B:
client=r190-134-zz-xx.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy[190.134.zz.xx], sa
Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática wrote:
Dear users, I realized today that the local SMTP server is not working
as expected.
I found these lines in the log files:
Mar 2 22:42:48 smtp postfix/smtpd[30427]: 1A66913105B:
client=r190-134-zz-xx.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy[190.134.zz.xx], sa
Dear users, I realized today that the local SMTP server is not working
as expected.
I found these lines in the log files:
Mar 2 22:42:48 smtp postfix/smtpd[30427]: 1A66913105B:
client=r190-134-zz-xx.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy[190.134.zz.xx], sa
sl_method=PLAIN, sasl_username=usuario1
Mar 2
13 matches
Mail list logo
