work fine on my box CentOS 5.3
http://pastebin.ca/1501508
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:04:41 -0400, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 7/20/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote:
>> Before I bought my iTouch last year I thought I was going to hate the
>> touch-screen keyboard, but the auto correction and th
On 7/20/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote:
> Before I bought my iTouch last year I thought I was going to hate the
> touch-screen keyboard, but the auto correction and the editing is so
> easy that it's not much of an issue. Now with the 3GS I am even
> willing to type fairly long emails with
On 20-Jul-2009, at 04:57, Charles Marcus wrote:
Now, if Apple would make an iPhone with a G1 style hardware
keyboard, I'd even buy one... ;)
Before I bought my iTouch last year I thought I was going to hate the
touch-screen keyboard, but the auto correction and the editing is so
easy that
On 7/19/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote:
> We are primarily using POP, but with more iPhone users, and a new
> mail server that actually lets me dole out more space, I think we'll
> likely push IMAP more.
Incidentally, the iPhone has one of the best IMAP clients I've seen on a
phone
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 7/18/2009, Sahil Tandon (sa...@tandon.net) wrote:
Just so I understand, you don't use POP3 on the server you manage;
you have never compared POP3 performance on Dovecot vs.
$something_else, but you are commenting on the lack of performance
benefit?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
fakessh escribió:
>> (MySQL+Postfix+Courier(+Amavisd-new)) and we are quite happy with it.
>> Check it at http://www.ispconfig.org
>
> its lol ? ... trool
I don't think so. Why do you think it is? I mean, the man asks for
something that can work with
> (MySQL+Postfix+Courier(+Amavisd-new)) and we are quite happy with it.
> Check it at http://www.ispconfig.org
its lol ? ... trool
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:29:08 +0200, Ignacio Garcia wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
-Continued use of Courier-IMAP. Not so muc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>> -Continued use of Courier-IMAP. Not so much because I like it, but I
>>> don't want POP UUIDs changing or any big changes in IMAP quirks that
>>> suddenly cause users grief. It seems like Courier+Maildrop is fairly
>>> common though, so I think
On 7/18/2009 11:23 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>>> See: http://wiki.dovecot.org/POP3Server
>> Yep, seems to say something similar...
> What's with all the ellipses?! Finish your thought! :)
Ok, I'll try... ;)
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 7/18/2009, Sahil Tandon (sa...@tandon.net) wrote:
> > Just so I understand, you don't use POP3 on the server you manage;
> > you have never compared POP3 performance on Dovecot vs.
> > $something_else, but you are commenting on the lack of performan
On 7/18/2009, Sahil Tandon (sa...@tandon.net) wrote:
> Just so I understand, you don't use POP3 on the server you manage;
> you have never compared POP3 performance on Dovecot vs.
> $something_else, but you are commenting on the lack of performance
> benefit? :)
Only because I've been on the dove
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 7/18/2009, Res (r...@ausics.net) wrote:
> > > Oh... and although I did recommend moving to dovecot, if all you use is
> > > POP, and there is no chance you will be switching to IMAP, then it I
> > > don't think you'd see any benefit switching to dove
On 7/18/2009, Res (r...@ausics.net) wrote:
> > Oh... and although I did recommend moving to dovecot, if all you use is
> > POP, and there is no chance you will be switching to IMAP, then it I
> > don't think you'd see any benefit switching to dovecot...
>
> Except the performance increase under Do
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
Oh... and although I did recommend moving to dovecot, if all you use is
POP, and there is no chance you will be switching to IMAP, then it I
don't think you'd see any benefit switching to dovecot...
Except the performance increase under Dovecot is 30
On 7/18/2009, mouss (mo...@ml.netoyen.net) wrote:
>> -Continued use of Courier-IMAP. Not so much because I like it, but I
>> don't want POP UUIDs changing or any big changes in IMAP quirks that
>> suddenly cause users grief. It seems like Courier+Maildrop is fairly
>> common though, so I think I'
Charles Sprickman a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> We've been using vpopmail+qmail for the past 6 years or so, and need to
> deploy new hardware. I'm seriously considering a move to something more
> modern on the software side. Vpopmail has worked well for us, but it's
> a bit hackish, as is the bundl
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 7/16/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote:
-Continued use of Courier-IMAP. Not so much because I like it, but I
don't want POP UUIDs changing or any big changes in IMAP quirks that
suddenly cause users grief. It seems like Courier+Maildr
On 7/16/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote:
> -Continued use of Courier-IMAP. Not so much because I like it, but I
> don't want POP UUIDs changing or any big changes in IMAP quirks that
> suddenly cause users grief. It seems like Courier+Maildrop is fairly
> common though, so I think
Hello all,
We've been using vpopmail+qmail for the past 6 years or so, and need to
deploy new hardware. I'm seriously considering a move to something more
modern on the software side. Vpopmail has worked well for us, but it's a
bit hackish, as is the bundle of patches to try and make qmail m
19 matches
Mail list logo
