On 2016/11/27 13:15, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
I hate to bug the list for what is probably a dumb question, but is there any situation
where an unauthorized user needs to connect to port 587? I'm wondering if there is some
oddball "edge" case.
My thought is to use my ipfw table of known tro
The IPFW block is working fine. I also added blocking for 143 of course.
Original Message
From: @lbutlr
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 4:42 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Port 587 users question
On 11/27/16 2:15 PM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> is there any situat
On 11/27/16 2:15 PM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
is there any situation where an unauthorized user needs to connect to port 587?
Not that I can think of.
On 28 Nov 2016, at 13:47, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:01:41 -0500
btb wrote:
On 2016.11.27 20.43, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
I should have mentioned the mail system is on a VPS and I'm the only
user. And yes, trouble makers are on the Internet.
well, this simplifies
On 2016.11.28 13.47, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:01:41 -0500 btb wrote:
>
>> On 2016.11.27 20.43, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
>>> I should have mentioned the mail system is on a VPS and I'm the
>>> only user. And yes, trouble makers are on the Internet.
>>
>> well, this
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:01:41 -0500
btb wrote:
> On 2016.11.27 20.43, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> > I should have mentioned the mail system is on a VPS and I'm the only
> > user. And yes, trouble makers are on the Internet.
>
> well, this simplifies things quite of bit, of course.
>
> > What
On 2016.11.27 20.43, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> I should have mentioned the mail system is on a VPS and I'm the only
> user. And yes, trouble makers are on the Internet.
well, this simplifies things quite of bit, of course.
> What lead me to this was I did bzgrep "max auth" and noticed both
>
vers hammering 587 is odd, but I noticed I get about two a day.
And these are just when rate limiting come in. I suppose they could be
misconfigured servers.
Original Message
From: b...@bitrate.net
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 5:15 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Port 587 users question
On Nov 27, 2016, at 16.15, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
>
> I hate to bug the list for what is probably a dumb question, but is there any
> situation where an unauthorized user needs to connect to port 587? I'm
> wondering if there is some oddball "edge" case.
well, i suppose it would depend up
I hate to bug the list for what is probably a dumb question, but is there any
situation where an unauthorized user needs to connect to port 587? I'm
wondering if there is some oddball "edge" case.
My thought is to use my ipfw table of known trouble makers to block 587.
10 matches
Mail list logo
